-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Hitman Bench Thread
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 2,643
Yeah, given this game/ benchmark looks to be slightly cpu bottlenecked, 4770k @ 4.4 is probably equivalent to SB @ 4.8-4.9ish. Think I remember from reading in past that HW @ 4.5 was roughly equivalent to SB @ 5GHz, so there or thereabouts.
Will need to have a proper play around with the cpu oc instead of doing an bios auto overclock to see what I can properly get out of the chip since I have good cooling. Not keen on de-lidding though
Caporegime
Yeah, given this game/ benchmark looks to be slightly cpu bottlenecked, 4770k @ 4.4 is probably equivalent to SB @ 4.8-4.9ish. Think I remember from reading in past that HW @ 4.5 was roughly equivalent to SB @ 5GHz, so there or thereabouts.
Will need to have a proper play around with the cpu oc instead of doing an bios auto overclock to see what I can properly get out of the chip since I have good cooling. Not keen on de-lidding though
There's only a bottleneck at 1080P when using two cards. That can be overcome with a decent cpu overclock. I tested single card and found no cpu bottleneck present. No difference in my single card scores, even with a low cpu overclock. At 1440P there is no bottleneck. At 1080P the cpu clock can be important with two cards, but it also comes down to drivers and scaling.
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 2,643
I will try a single card run later out of curiosity to see how well CF scales (using 13.12 WHQL) with that modest cpu overclock.
2 x 290Xs @1200/1625
4930k @4.8
1080p
104.97 fps
2 x 290Xs @1250/1625
4930k @4.8
1600p
82.74 fps
Overclocking @1080p for two cards makes only a little difference
4930k @4.8
1080p
104.97 fps
2 x 290Xs @1250/1625
4930k @4.8
1600p
82.74 fps
Overclocking @1080p for two cards makes only a little difference
Caporegime
1090t @ 3.6GHz
7870 Tahiti @ 1175/1620
33.18 avg fps
I wonder if you're on the limit of vram with those minimum fps.
Is there any way of finding out?
Caporegime
Msi afterburners on screen display or gpu-z.
If it is the same as my 690s, the bench runs fine with no dips. Where the low comes from is where the card is exiting the benchmark at the end.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
This games optimised for AMD... "Simples" nothing to analyze.
Caporegime
Caporegime
65.2fps.
1080P single card.
[email protected], RAM@2133Mhz, R9 290X@1200/1500
Do I really need to post a screenshot? it is me after all.
1080P single card.
[email protected], RAM@2133Mhz, R9 290X@1200/1500
Do I really need to post a screenshot? it is me after all.
Caporegime
Caporegime
Updated post.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
Less excuses, more results please.
If it only it was! I've never seen my cards run so **** in a benchmark yet!
It's a bad day when a pair of 7970's are keeping up
Caporegime
If it only it was! I've never seen my cards run so **** in a benchmark yet!
It's a bad day when a pair of 7970's are keeping up
Show me a single card result.
Its supposed to be an original, full size screen capture.
Kaap might let you off though.