Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard

humbug · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:09

Martini1991 said:
If that genuinely was the case, why would AMD launch it as it is?
It's got problems (None performance related), yet they launched, without stock, so it's not like delaying it would have hurt them.

Maybe it will get better, maybe it won't. But so far I'm completely disappointed in AMD's 2015 offerings. First time I've basically never gone for a launch since I've been an enthusiast.

Ask me again in 3 weeks, and i bet most of the stock has gone to China, the rest to Project Quantum and some leftovers to the US and EU.

Captain · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:11

5930K @ 3.9
980Ti @ 1466/1750
353.30

Martini1991 · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:12

humbug said:
Ask me again in 3 weeks, and i bet most of the stock has gone to China, the rest to Project Quantum and some leftovers to the US and EU.

Isn't project Quantum nano's?

And fair enough, but apart from stock/pump issue, I can't see performance being rectified in 3 weeks.

EDIT : Removed incorrect information.

Joe! · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:14

humbug said:
This is CPU heavy, ignore the OSD in heaven, with Nvidia it reads the clocks wrong and with AMD it seems to think its hotter than the Sun, literally reads about a million degrees.

And well done on your 4K score, Kaap has just hung himself.

Haha, fair enough at the clock readings.

As for my 4K score, I'm surprised it did so well. Spent a few hours tweaking clocks and running benchmarks (for the first time I should add), really enjoyed it.

Going to try to pick up a 5820k in the next few weeks I guess!

humbug · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:28

All updated

Martini1991 said:
Isn't project Quantum nano's?
And isn't the fury pro launching Tuesday, and Gibbo currently has no stock?

And fair enough, but apart from stock/pump issue, I can't see performance being rectified in 3 weeks.

No, its a pair of Fury-X's, Fury-XX2 i guess....

humbug · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:45

Powercolor PCS+ R9 290P @ 1100/1400, 15.7

2560x1440P

1586

whyscotty · 12 Jul 2015 at 14:49

[email protected] - - 980ti@1291/1752

1440

F1aw1ess · 12 Jul 2015 at 20:36

980Ti 1515/8050
i7 3770K 4.3
353.38 Drivers
Extreme HD Preset 1920X1080p

humbug · 13 Jul 2015 at 02:43

Done

8 Pack · 13 Jul 2015 at 14:40

KFA2 980 Ti HOF@1850/2142 First Run, Move on!! HOF tearing up the benchmarks again.
5960X 5.9/4.8 DDR43000C11
ASUS RVE
8Pack PSU
Thermal Grizzley FTW!!

Gregster · 13 Jul 2015 at 14:43

Incredible score Ian. Nicely done.

humbug · 14 Jul 2015 at 03:26

Done.

Razor Time · 17 Jul 2015 at 23:19

GTX 980Ti - 1,510Mhz/2,000Mhz
i7 4970K @ 4.6Ghz
1080P

Score: 4790

humbug · 18 Jul 2015 at 03:47

Done.

TonyTurbo78 · 18 Jul 2015 at 11:53

I7 3770k @ 4.4GHz
Crossfire 390 @ stock (1050MHz/1500MHz

humbug · 18 Jul 2015 at 18:48

Done

Lokken86 · 18 Jul 2015 at 18:50

Is a 1440p run using vsr a valid score?

humbug · 18 Jul 2015 at 18:54

Lokken86 said:
Is a 1440p run using vsr a valid score?

Yes.

Lokken86 · 18 Jul 2015 at 18:56

Ok cool Il try it on the fury pro don't expect a great score at 1080p but might do well at 1440p.

Deleted member 66701 · 21 Jul 2015 at 14:56

Razor Time said:
GTX 980Ti - 1,510Mhz/2,000Mhz
i7 4970K @ 4.6Ghz
1080P

Score: 4790

Great score.

The clocks versus score don't seem to add up though.

Competitor rules

**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**

Deleted member 66701

Deleted member 66701

Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard