Which UV filter size for Nikon D3100?

Associate
Joined
8 Apr 2004
Posts
2,054
Hey guys, just picked up my first ever Digital SLR from Jessops, a Nikon D3100! I've already ordered some Sandisk Ultra SDHC cards and I'll get a bag soon, probably a Lowepro one? The AW 160 or something. I'm going to Vietnam for 3 months in a few weeks so I wanted to be prepared.

However one thing I'm still not sure about is the UV filter size. Some Google results say 58mm, others say 52mm. Jessops sell a bundle with the camera that includes a 52mm one, so I assume that's the correct size? There's a B+W one for about £12 I'm looking at, but any suggestions are more than welcome. I'm getting it mainly for the protection, but it should have course make no different to my pictures as well!
 
Associate
Joined
2 Jun 2005
Posts
1,496
Location
Hull
52mm I think but I don't use my kit lens so I have never bought one for it.

If you have a look at the end of the lens you'll see a screw thread, thats the filter attachment. It the diameter of that that governs the filter size you need to buy.
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Oct 2006
Posts
4,947
Location
Wiltshire
If you want it to make no difference to your pics then you need to spend a lot more than £12. I use the Hoya Pro1 Digital range, either UV or just
'protector'. Not cheap, especially the larger sizes, but they have good multi-coating so don't take much away from the results. A cheap single-coated filter is worse than useless.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,614
On the lens, it says Nikon DX AF-S Nikkor 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6G VR.

I wouldn't put a UV filter on this lens.

There is a time and a place for a UV filter but the kit lens is not a lens that deserves a UV filter.

With a UV filter you need to buy a good branded filter with multi coating and a solid frame that what jump threads on the lens.
The other thing is it is pointless gettign a UV filter for filtering UV as the sensor just aren't sensitive to UV.

So I pressume you want a UV filter for protection, if yo then look at buying a protection filter.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
24 Oct 2005
Posts
2,047
Location
Lincolnshire
As above, I really wouldn't bother with a filter for protection at all.

A decent one that won't adversely effect the image quality will probably cost half of what the lens does...
 
Associate
Joined
7 Mar 2007
Posts
1,244
As above, I really wouldn't bother with a filter for protection at all.

A decent one that won't adversely effect the image quality will probably cost half of what the lens does...

I doubt you would be able to tell the difference in a picture with a £12 filter on and off.
 
Associate
Joined
24 Oct 2005
Posts
2,047
Location
Lincolnshire
I doubt you would be able to tell the difference in a picture with a £12 filter on and off.

Maybe, maybe not.

The photographer is the biggest variable anyway.

You have your views, I have mine, but experience and a lot of money wasted on cheap filters tells me that they rarely do anything to enhance image quality, and more often than not make it worse, and that's before you get in to colour casts...
 
Associate
Joined
14 Dec 2009
Posts
130
I've never seen a definitive answer to the need for a UV filter with a digital camera. Certainly needed for film but I'm not so sure about digital and I have never bothered, although they certainly make cleaning easier, particularly if the front element is recessed a lot.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,614
I've never seen a definitive answer to the need for a UV filter with a digital camera. Certainly needed for film but I'm not so sure about digital and I have never bothered, although they certainly make cleaning easier, particularly if the front element is recessed a lot.

Digital sensors have no issue with UV unlike film, so the UV coating of a UV filter has no purpose these days. They are used only for protection, so under these circumstances you need a high quality filter to provide protection and you want to avoid low quality filters which visually reduce the image quality.

I use no filters on cheap lenses (< £500) and use high quality B+W filters on my expensive lenses for casual shooting, but remove them for professional photography.

However, a CPL is on my walk about lenses most of the time anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom