What is most likely to cause high fuel consumption?

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
11,038
Location
Romford/Hornchurch, Essex
Do NOT do this on your practical test, you will fail or get a minor at the least. The DSA Examinors will expect you to change down gear when approaching things you have to slow down and stop at (until you come to a near stop, obviously)

huh? so easing off/engine braking is a fail now?

im talking about not accerating upto obstructions (lights etc), but trying to ease off to hope obstructions are cleared
 

Hxc

Hxc

Soldato
Joined
29 Oct 2004
Posts
12,501
Location
London
Rolling up to lights was certainly encouraged when I was driving and I did it all through my practical test... it's more economical as you arn't always fully stopping and starting.
 
Associate
Joined
28 Oct 2005
Posts
174
Location
Reading
B, as explained above.

The rest are rubbish really unless in context.

I.E staying in high gears at 30mph is not a great idea anyway.

Staying above 50 is neccasary on a motorway anyway.

Why is this?

I've always meant to ask - if you are just in a steady stream of traffic that is going about 30mph, is it detrimental to put the car in 5th and happily cruise along?
 
Associate
Joined
16 Jan 2003
Posts
1,913
Why is this?

I've always meant to ask - if you are just in a steady stream of traffic that is going about 30mph, is it detrimental to put the car in 5th and happily cruise along?

depends on the car and gearing. For instance mine copes fine in 6th at 30mph but my old car wouldn't. Its fairly obvious though as you can hear the car labouring if its in too high a gear.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
159,588
Why is this?

I've always meant to ask - if you are just in a steady stream of traffic that is going about 30mph, is it detrimental to put the car in 5th and happily cruise along?

No, this is fine in a BMW 535d, Audi A6 3.0 TDI or a Mercedes E500.

Yes, this is detrimental in a Nissan Micra 1.0
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Posts
3,606
Location
Liverpool
Got a reply...

Hi Rob

The question was set by the DSA as part of the theory test syllabus,
however, it is true that cars burn more fuel when travelling faster,
especially over 50mph. This however is at a constant speed so a car that
drives a mile at 70mph will burn more fuel than a car that travels a mile at
50mph. So technically the question is right - remember the DSA and other
authorities don't like speed.

Best regards

Richard

Might be true for some cars but certainly doesn't seem to be the case for mine. There you go anyway, its a DSA answer. Which I still think is wrong :p
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Posts
2,668
Location
Wirral, UK
Standing still in traffic kills my fuel economy. I get 10mpg and that's only because the guage won't display any lower than that.

Stands to reason, surely? :p

Even if the engine is burning fuel much more slowly than when you're travelling at, say, 55mph on the motorway, you're not actually going anywhere so the live economy is always going to be 0.

My 5 series shows the economy as infinite when I'm stationary which I find strange.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
16,483
Location
Shakespeare’s County
How will aggressive breaking use more fuel? lol

Cos you spend more time prior to the braking maintaining speed rather than utilising engine braking under fuel cut conditions. Also generally results in overbraking that reading the lights.

Late braking at a red light usually results in you stopping where as if you read ahead and drive steadier you can roll to the lights in enough time for them to go green then you only have to accelerate from 10mph and not a dead stop.

Speed is the main thing. When i drive now though I try to do so without using the brakes, it pays dividends.
 

Jez

Jez

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,073
The answer to this HAS to be the braking answer, as in all cars aggressive braking will result in inefficient use of the cars momentum.

Driving above 50 is a nonsense answer, my s-class for example is most efficient at around 70mph, 50mph is too slow for top gear hence the car changes down.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
16,483
Location
Shakespeare’s County
The answer to this HAS to be the braking answer, as in all cars aggressive braking will result in inefficient use of the cars momentum.

Driving above 50 is a nonsense answer, my s-class for example is most efficient at around 70mph, 50mph is too slow for top gear hence the car changes down.

If you do a motorway drive it doesnt matter on your braking as you do so little does it? We dont know if agressive means simply quick braking or braking quickly such that you can an overshoot of speed retardation so you end up slower than you intended to be and hence have to accelerate even more after the braking.

Aero drag is the main force a car has to overcome, speed gives this force by result of doubling the speed = 4 times the drag. The engine burns fuel to give this.

There is something odd with your merc if you get less rpm at 50mph. The fact its not in its top gear means nothing regarding the engine efficiency when you might be sat at a better BSFC point at 50mph in 4th than 5th. I guess the main reason is that you dont get direct lock in your auto box in anything other than top gear?

You answer kind of ignores physics and facts using your own opinions, but I guess we're getting used to that from Jez. :o
 

Jez

Jez

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,073
I guess the main reason is that you dont get direct lock in your auto box in anything other than top gear?

That may be the answer, i am merely stating the fact that in one particular car the economy shown is greater when cruising at 70mph than it is at 50mph. I see this day in day out when stuck in 50mph specs sections of motorway for example.

It is therefore a nonsense answer, as it totally depends on the vehicle.
 

Jez

Jez

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,073
Its clearly C.

What has braking got to do with fuel economy. What difference does it make if I brake up to a junction gradually, or if I slam the car to a stop suddenly.

Because if you slowly came to a stop using engine braking, then you would not have been using fuel for that last few hundred yards...
 
Back
Top Bottom