High Quality Music ?

Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Posts
14,340
Location
ArcCorp
Anyone know of a place that sells high quality music downloads ?

As I've upgraded headphones to the DT990 Pro's and gotten the Asus STX II I've noticed a lot of my music has some really low quality segments and it's starting to be an earache.

Any info is appreciated :)
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Posts
14,340
Location
ArcCorp
As per a thread on here a while ago, most people couldn't tell the difference between 320kbps mp3 and flac, a number of those with much higher end audio equipment as well.

Well it doesn't need to be FLAC as a lot of the MP3's I have aren't exactly good quality so 320kbps would be a nice step up :)
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Posts
7,376
Location
Ankh Morpork
As per a thread on here a while ago, most people couldn't tell the difference between 320kbps mp3 and flac, a number of those with much higher end audio equipment as well.

I have a few 96kHz (and above) FLAC recordings because they have been remastered to produce the best possible sound quality - it's the remastering not the encoding that makes most difference and the difference between these and the original versions is noticeable.

Otherwise I just encode CDs to 24/44.1 FLAC because why would I record to a lower quality than the CD itself if space is not an issue?
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Posts
8,442
Location
Ceredigion
Mastering > Encoding. You can pick almost any artist (easiest with rock tbh) with albums spanning the 80-00s and you can hear an audible difference in audio quality - even at the same bitrate. Music started to get compressed a lot more, even in the mastering stage :( This is also extremely noticeable with re-releases of old albums - get an original and compare it to the re-release and there is a very obvious difference in sq.

Best bet is to rip CDs to FLAC. Can get CDs dirt cheap now as no-one wants them - everyone relies on digital downloads/streaming.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Posts
7,376
Location
Ankh Morpork
I think the volume wars started in the mid 90's and a lot of releases are noticeably inferior due to the ridiculous amount of clipping - sadly it's still going on today.

A good example is Night Visions by Imagine Dragons - truly awful sound quality, simply because the levels have been boosted too much
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Jun 2012
Posts
5,951
I have a 24/96 FLAC vinyl rip of 'In Rainbows' that stands head and shoulders above anything else I have, I also have 320kps MP3s that completely rinse certain Indie CD FLAC rips, it's more to do with the production than pure file format and compression.

On the whole though 128k MP3 is pretty dire no matter how good the source material, all IMO of course.

I ripped my whole 2k+ CD collection lossless a few years ago and it's often impossible to tell the CD rips apart from later bought MP3 albums, and over the years that's been through a whole host of high end headphones and Hi-Fi with an RRP of near enough £10k.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
17 Jun 2012
Posts
5,951
Depends what they are, all solid state and some big hard to drive speakers and I'd agree, it's all much of a muchness, the differences are stark when compared to high sensitivity speakers and low power valve amps in front of a good vinyl source.

The quality of solid state gear nowadays means it's just a case of picking which one you like the look of and having the features you want, sound wise there's nothing in it.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,053
As per a thread on here a while ago, most people couldn't tell the difference between 320kbps mp3 and flac, a number of those with much higher end audio equipment as well.

I think that test was a bit flawed - none the least when I first did it through firefox it was impossible to tell the samples apart whereas pulling them out of the cache and playing through a media player externally showed some differences.
 
Back
Top Bottom