*** Official Ubiquiti Discussion Thread ***

Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2003
Posts
12,450
Location
Chatteris
So the "RF Environment Scan" option that you can do from the device - silly question, but what is that actually showing me?
I did a 2G scan and got the following back:







So not being someone who understands this. Is green telling me the optimal channels to choose? Or......?
Basically, what does that all mean and from that, which channel should I be ideally running on?

Cheers.
 
Associate
Joined
11 Mar 2005
Posts
365
Which model did you buy ? I've been lurking on this thread for a while wondering whether to pull the trigger. I'm on virgin too and had been thinking the range and throughput would improve by moving to one of these instead of the SH2 wireless.

So I suppose I had time to rethink my post. The issue is that I had too much of a expectation from the uniquiti. The virgin media superhub AC 2 is actually quite a good router when it comes to wifi range. 10 years back replacing the ISP router with a third party one gave twice the performance, however the latest virgin media ones are decent. The 5Ghz band range in both cases is not usable unless Im in the room next to the router/ubiquiti APs.

I bought the ubiquiti AC Long Range, and honestly it gives little difference so I wouldnt advise replacing the virgin media with it. What I will instead do is either run 2xubiquitis in parallel or the Virgin media and the ubiquti together and put one of the ubiquitis at the furthest away point of the house, potentially using the faster 1200mbps powerlines, this may also be the best option for yourself.

Wireless channel wise- Im using a channel with no interference from the neighbours, Im only getting a maximum of 40mbps wireless on both virgin media and ubiquiti (tested using speedtest.net and testing the lan link using iperf). Getting 100mb+ wired so wireless seems to the issue, I'll do some further investigation and if i come across anything Ill report back
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
2 Dec 2005
Posts
5,515
Location
Herts
The issue is that I had too much of a expectation from the uniquiti.

Sorry to hear this OP.

Hopefully some of the regulars on this subforum who are always quick to recommend ubiquiti stuff as panacea will take note. The number of threads that get several posts in a row saying "buy a ubiquiti ..." is getting tiresome.
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Mar 2003
Posts
12,450
Location
Chatteris
Sorry to hear this OP.

Hopefully some of the regulars on this subforum who are always quick to recommend ubiquiti stuff as panacea will take note. The number of threads that get several posts in a row saying "buy a ubiquiti ..." is getting tiresome.

Or - of everyone who has purchased one this is the first one that hasn't "lived up to expectation". On that ratio I'd say the people who continue to recommend are still spot on with said recommendation.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Posts
12,096
There's nothing magical about them. They must be using standard commercially available wireless chipsets, and they have to work within the permitted power limits.

If your existing wireless router has decent wireless and is located in a good central location then you probably aren't going to see a massive benefit.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Apr 2004
Posts
4,890
Location
Bath
There's nothing magical about them. They must be using standard commercially available wireless chipsets, and they have to work within the permitted power limits.

If your existing wireless router has decent wireless and is located in a good central location then you probably aren't going to see a massive benefit.

I think it's down to the design - they force you to think about positioning. Average joe will typically place their router next or near to the demarcation point but the ubiquiti lot will do their best to place their access points in the optimum position. I'm sure if I stuck my router on the ceiling in the central point of my house upstairs my performance would be just as good.
 
Soldato
Joined
16 Jan 2003
Posts
10,574
Location
Nottingham
The Unfi AP's just have the benefit of enterprise features and the fact they are POE makes them easier to place than traditional AP's so as said more likely to be placed in an optimal position.

I doubt the actual WiFi performance is much different to an Asus or Netgear router in a similar price bracket.
 

Deleted member 138126

D

Deleted member 138126

UniFi APs give fabulous coverage, great stability, a useful subset of enterprise features, all for a very reasonable price. I am over the moon with my two UAP AC Pros, have had them for several months, and off the back of that experience I bought 8-port and 16-port UniFi switches.

The greatest testament for me was when my wife (without my having told her anything) said "did you do something to make the wifi better?".
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Feb 2009
Posts
4,978
Location
South Wirral
So I suppose I had time to rethink my post. The issue is that I had too much of a expectation from the uniquiti. The virgin media superhub AC 2 is actually quite a good router when it comes to wifi range. 10 years back replacing the ISP router with a third party one gave twice the performance, however the latest virgin media ones are decent. The 5Ghz band range in both cases is not usable unless Im in the room next to the router/ubiquiti APs.

I bought the ubiquiti AC Long Range, and honestly it gives little difference so I wouldnt advise replacing the virgin media with it. What I will instead do is either run 2xubiquitis in parallel or the Virgin media and the ubiquti together and put one of the ubiquitis at the furthest away point of the house, potentially using the faster 1200mbps powerlines, this may also be the best option for yourself.

Wireless channel wise- Im using a channel with no interference from the neighbours, Im only getting a maximum of 40mbps wireless on both virgin media and ubiquiti (tested using speedtest.net and testing the lan link using iperf). Getting 100mb+ wired so wireless seems to the issue, I'll do some further investigation and if i come across anything Ill report back

Thanks for the feedback. I suspect my issue is more about the placement of the SH2 as others have also commented. Ours is in a bottom-left-back corner of the house where the TV is and really the only place with a signal issue is the top-right-front bedroom. I was looking at pre-empting problems as my girls are getting older and one is likely to be wanting a computer in her bedroom soon for homework come September. Your thought of running two could be a possibility as I have a wired connection upstairs that one could connect to.
 

Deleted member 138126

D

Deleted member 138126

Computers in bedrooms...? Hmmm over my dead body I think. Maybe when they turn 21?
 
Associate
Joined
10 Jun 2014
Posts
227
Remember the device connecting to the AP also has to send its signal back... changing APs will not make your laptop/phone etc more powerful or have more antennas. Better APs handle *bad* wireless more gracefully than cheap ones.
 
Associate
Joined
23 Oct 2006
Posts
939
Location
Lincoln
Well I have installed on of these on the top level of my house and I am impressed with the coverage so far I am using my wireless router on the bottom floor and all of my devices seem to switch over from one to the other nice, the only thing I have noticed is that when I go back on to the UniFi AP my phone doesn't say Wi-fi calling on it but if I go back down stairs on to my original wi-fi router it picks it back up?

I'm going to order another one for downstairs in the garage in any case.
 

Deleted member 138126

D

Deleted member 138126

I'll trust them until proven wrong. My girls are sensible, although that could all go wrong come teenager time.

I had an Apple II in my room from age 14 and think I turned out ok.
I'm pretty sure your Apple II didn't have Internet access. I'm hoping my daughters turn our pretty sensible too, but this stuff really worries me.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
20 Sep 2006
Posts
34,022
I've got a pro in my house and it's superb. I get wifi everywhere, even down to the end of the garden. I've turned wifi off now on my RT-N66U and I'm actually looking for a wired router to replace it with.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Posts
6,847
Was kinda looking forward to trying one of these but it turns out I don't need one. The 5 GHz WiFi of my TP-Link Archer VR900 reaches all the way to the top floor and into the garden, and I get maximum internet speeds in both places. I assume the 2.4 GHz WiFi would also reach my parking space but I haven't had a need to use WiFi there yet.
 
Don
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
46,753
Location
Parts Unknown
I've got a pro in my house and it's superb. I get wifi everywhere, even down to the end of the garden. I've turned wifi off now on my RT-N66U and I'm actually looking for a wired router to replace it with.

Edgerouter Lite (you'll need any switch too if you want more than one port to be used)
 
Back
Top Bottom