VAT Added For Digital Goods : Non EU

Soldato
Joined
15 Aug 2011
Posts
4,939
Hey Guys

There is a discussion going on over in the iracing forums at the moment.

Basically, iracing have begun to add VAT on all products sold, beforehand they never did.

Iracing in based in the USA, so someone on the forums has stated that digital goods bought outside the EU below 22 Euros doesn't apply to the VAT laws for the EU.

There have been a couple of links posted, for example

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-3746_en.htm

Where it states, Not a level playing field.

Point 3 of
https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...-thresholds-low-value-consignment-relief-lvcr

Or does VAT MOSS over ride all the above points!

If it does, that would mean that iracing would have to be VAT registered within the UK, and I suppose all the other countries within the EU that it sells to?

Cheers
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Mar 2004
Posts
29,913
Location
England
Not a level playing field: under current rules, imported goods bought online from non-EU countries are exempt from VAT if they cost below €22. Companies based outside the EU can fraudulently mark expensive goods such as mobile phones and tablets as costing less than €22, meaning that no VAT is paid. This puts EU businesses at a clear disadvantage to non-EU businesses.

A great example of why sales taxes are terrible. VAT should have been abolished ages ago. The value doesn't even need to be marked as below 22 euros because it's a % not a fixed fee so EU companies will still be massively undercut!

Who even knows how much damage VAT is causing to our digital goods market where there's no way to even estimate sales.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2006
Posts
23,364
Oh well, we will be out of the EU soon so VAT might drop again :D

It was them that told us to make it 20% to be more "on par" with the rest of the EU
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Sep 2012
Posts
11,696
Location
Surrey
Oh well, we will be out of the EU soon so VAT might drop again :D

It was them that told us to make it 20% to be more "on par" with the rest of the EU

You think we are likely to see a drop in VAT or that the EU forced the UK to charge 20% VAT?

As far as i am aware, the standard minimum VAT for the EU is 15%
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Sep 2012
Posts
11,696
Location
Surrey
Their governments decided that?

VAT rates for eu countries range from about 17% to 27%. The reason why they are more ore less in the same area is to avoid undercutting each-other and to keep trading fair. I would imagine we would see an increase in VAT before we see a decrease and that would be regardless of brexit or not.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,677
Location
Co Durham
Oh well, we will be out of the EU soon so VAT might drop again :D

It was them that told us to make it 20% to be more "on par" with the rest of the EU

lol. Successive governments here believe indirect taxation such as VAT,fuel duty and Insurance tax is far more palatable than direct taxation to the voting public.

Which is why we continue to have direct taxes lowered over the years and more and more indirect taxes introduced.

It amazes me that the public dont kick off more about IPT. its now 10% and will be 12% from June and pretty much affects everybody as most people have some form of insurance.

The last budget the chancellor said that freezing fuel duty would save people £100m. However, the increase in IPT he announced costs people £100m a year so basically nobody got anything.

All smoke and mirrors.

Plus has always been convenient for any government to blame the EU when they want to introduce a tax rise.
 
Joined
4 Aug 2007
Posts
21,415
Location
Wilds of suffolk
Google is apparently upping their Play Store prices too as a result of tax.

I thought they were doing it for the same reason as apple, to keep app prices relatively similar in all domains when converted to $

The UK prices rose because on the tanking of the pound post brexit reffy, apple only adjust the prices every so often.

Governments prefer indirect taxation for 2 main reasons,
1) Less headline grabing (so more stealthy)
2) Much harder to avoid by tax dodgers such as some self employed etc
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Mar 2004
Posts
29,913
Location
England
I thought they were doing it for the same reason as apple, to keep app prices relatively similar in all domains when converted to $

The UK prices rose because on the tanking of the pound post brexit reffy, apple only adjust the prices every so often.

Governments prefer indirect taxation for 2 main reasons,
1) Less headline grabing (so more stealthy)
2) Much harder to avoid by tax dodgers such as some self employed etc

The irony is that VAT is the easiest tax to evade. I've managed to avoid paying over £1000 of tax on photography equipment over the last couple of years because retailers just declare the items as low value.
 
Associate
Joined
20 Oct 2005
Posts
1,900
Location
Suffolk, UK
The irony is that VAT is the easiest tax to evade. I've managed to avoid paying over £1000 of tax on photography equipment over the last couple of years because retailers just declare the items as low value.

A lot of tax is easy to avoid, until HMRC suspect something about your accounts and really dig into them all. I know someone who was investigated back in the late 80's early 90's twice, they can spend 3 months tearing up every receipt, every invoice in your office. I forget if they actually found anything, but when they start doing that, you can bet they will come across something as simple as a false declaration of value. Then you get a nice criminal record for saving a grand.

The irony, as you put it, is you could legitimately save more in tax if the equipment was necessary for your work. Then, you can add the entire value onto your personal allowance, increasing the amount of tax you earn before you pay any tax at all. You get £11,000 tax free this year, if you buy a camera for £1000 incl VAT, then you get £12,000 tax free. This is assuming your profession relies on photography equipment.
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Mar 2004
Posts
29,913
Location
England
Actually income tax via paye is pretty much impossible to avoid for a standard employee, this is why it should be the tax of choice, it does not damage the domestic market like consumption taxes do.

I don't work as a photographer, and I haven't falsely declared the value of goods.

Fortunately we are now living in the world of digital currencies like bitcoin where records of financial transactions are next to non existent and the government can't monitor your assets, we are beginning to see society being liberated from unethical taxation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom