42.3% of Londoners have less than £100 in savings

Soldato
Joined
25 Sep 2009
Posts
9,627
Location
Billericay, UK
However, the research also showed that some people on low incomes do save money.

Roughly a quarter of adults with household incomes below £13,500 have more than £1,000 in savings.

£1,000 that's a pretty substantial amount of money for such a low income however there is not data that revealing peoples living circumstances. If your teenager or young adult and were living at home rent free £1,000 is more then doable however if you have rent, food and bills to pay that's pretty impressive.

I'm terrible with money management I horde all my cash and don't invest it properly (it's been worse since I found out my Mum's side of the family is Jewish) as rule of thumb I like to keep at least 3 months worth of mortgage payments in reserve in case I find myself out of work. I figure at worst I can get a low paid job to pay for food and some bills and before my savings dry up I should have found some new employment.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
25 Sep 2009
Posts
9,627
Location
Billericay, UK
So either 42.3℅ of londoners have no financial sense or 42.3℅ of londoners arent getting paid enough to live in london.

I don't think it's either of that as a nation we have a culture of of 'live for today' and the idea of saving money is alien to a lot of people. My grandmother who lived through the war was the complete opposite and would always have money away in savings that should have accrued through her life. The other issue is there's not much incentive to save lots as banks pay so little interest.

Edit: This is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
17,909
Location
London
Probably because we're a "nation of homeowners" :rolleyes: As a bitter renter I always wonder what the point of saving is when you can just pile your cash into this magical bricks-and-mortar cash-hound we call property. No doubt 40% of the population think the same if they're lucky enough to be on the "ladder".
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Jun 2004
Posts
26,684
Location
Deep England
Probably because we're a "nation of homeowners" :rolleyes: As a bitter renter I always wonder what the point of saving is when you can just pile your cash into this magical bricks-and-mortar cash-hound we call property. No doubt 40% of the population think the same if they're lucky enough to be on the "ladder".

There is not much point in saving these days. I've always saved up before making significant purchases (house aside) but this year I thought "sod it" and got myself an interest free credit-card and promptly went £2k in debt to buy myself a decent new bed/mattress. Should be able to pay it back before the interest free period ends, if not, I'll probably be able to get a new CC and transfer the balance.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
29,491
Location
Back in East London
You need a *lot* more than £100 to invest in property, so where are those between £0 and £enough-for-property putting their cash? Is what the article is asking.

Cash is very much inefficient for saving. "Saving money" is in fact an oxymoron because interest rates are currently always below inflation, especially for small amounts.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
17,909
Location
London
Cash is very much inefficient for saving. "Saving money" is in fact an oxymoron because interest rates are currently always below inflation, especially for small amounts.
But surely what you're talking about is "investing". Saving implies saving cash, no?
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
29,491
Location
Back in East London
But surely what you're talking about is "investing". Saving implies saving cash, no?

I mean keeping cash for the sake of keeping cash. If you have money sat in a bank account (or worse, in your pocket/under the bed/etc) you are *losing* money because of inflation, even when using "savings accounts" from the big banks, you are earning less interest than you are losing to inflation. Especially in London.

Investing cash is different - putting it behind some stock, or literally investing in a business venture or something, or even lending it to someone via a P2P lending site will give you a much better chance at getting a return, but you will not have instant access to it.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
10,676
Location
Castle Anthrax
I'm wondering how they define "Savings".

If you asked me how much I have in savings I'd say zero because I don't have a savings account and don't have anything squirreled away, however I've always got more than £100 in my current account and get nervous if it drops much below £500 or so before payday.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
30,885
Location
Shropshire
No shock really,Its only going to get worse too with ever increasing rent prices & bills.

I've been saying since last year now,Our minimum wage in the UK should be at least £10 per hour,If not more.

This was posted 3 days ago.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37477245

And when minimum wage increases so does the price of everything else to enable businesses to pay the extra wages.

It's not a magic bullet.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Mar 2006
Posts
8,336
As others have said I can't stand not having at least 3 months wages available.

I feel sorry for people having to live like this, unless they squander it of course.
 
Associate
Joined
26 Mar 2015
Posts
1,004
Location
West Midlands
This doesn't surprise me.

The problem these days is that things aren't build to last but instead be disposable and there are many people out there with the mentality of I must have the shiniest thing available at all times. I know people who have hardly a penny to their name at the end of the month but still went out and got the new iPhone.
 
Back
Top Bottom