Google has a lovely link on doing this in the bios: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539
Which is tragically inapplicable to any newer cards. The idea is to use rivatuner to emulate the workstation card. Rivatuner cannot do this above roughly 6*** series.
A second link: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t134631.html
is in no way a walkthrough of the process, but shows that changing the bios can achieve the desired result. He also uploaded the original and modified bios he used. The main point to this thread is to say that this works.
So far, I changed his bios to lower clock speeds to 8800gt stock, dug out a floppy drive and flashed my 8800. Windows and linux agree that I now have a fx 3700 in my computer, and I am pleased with myself.
No benchmarks or overclocking results yet. The intention from here is to flash back to my original (stock overclocked) bios and run as many benchmarks as I can find. I'll then flash to the fx 3700 and repeat.
Finally I'll put the card under water and see how far I can overclock it, then flash the bios to reflect these values and retest.
None of the above will help me at all in games, and may well hinder it. I'm after making CAD applications run better, and if I can successfully imitate the £600 professional card I am well happy.
Cheers all
edit: settled on spec viewperf as a benchmark system. its drawing very pretty pictures on my screen as I type. Many views, no comments, strange
edit2:
Well boys and girls, this works. Ill see if I can produce pretty graphs once I've got some more data to plot, but preliminary results look very good. At 600 / 1500 / 900 core/shaders/memory speed which I'm pretty sure is stock for the card, increases of roughly 25% can be seen between the different bios. Solid works from 12.4 to 16.4 being one I care about. NX from 4.95 to 5.03 is unfortunate as I use solid edge most at present, but increases across the board.
Now going to repeat at my card stock of 650/1620/950. I'll leave it there until I get the card under water, but all looking good so far
edit3:
Returned card to it's factory overclocked speed and reran tests. the slow speed quadro beat the faster nvidia by a fair margin. a couple of benchmarks showed slower fps when going from slow nvidia to faster nvidia, i'm undecided whether i can be bothered to retest at the slower speeds.
Thus far failed to replicate the sources work from scratch, i managed a working bios that installed 8800gt drivers then ran like crap. Currently have a card that identifies itself as an evga fx 3700 (possible unique )and is running through spec viewperf rather nicely, but under cross examination would admit to being an nvidia referance card.
Curiously no overheating issues with any of the tests despite the card running passive. Cpu is a 2.83ghz q9550, same windows install. Process undertaken is flash, remove drivers, reboot, install drivers, reboot, test, repeat. Not surprisingly, the overclocked fx 3700 is quicker than the stock fx 3700, and I am well pleased with myself.
edit4:
Now very confused. At 600mhz, changing to quadro makes things much better. At 650mhz, changing to quadro makes things a bit better. But the 600mhz quadro outperforms all the others. I'll think on this one, presumably my processor is now getting in the way. This may take longer than I'd intended as a result
Which is tragically inapplicable to any newer cards. The idea is to use rivatuner to emulate the workstation card. Rivatuner cannot do this above roughly 6*** series.
A second link: http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t134631.html
is in no way a walkthrough of the process, but shows that changing the bios can achieve the desired result. He also uploaded the original and modified bios he used. The main point to this thread is to say that this works.
So far, I changed his bios to lower clock speeds to 8800gt stock, dug out a floppy drive and flashed my 8800. Windows and linux agree that I now have a fx 3700 in my computer, and I am pleased with myself.
No benchmarks or overclocking results yet. The intention from here is to flash back to my original (stock overclocked) bios and run as many benchmarks as I can find. I'll then flash to the fx 3700 and repeat.
Finally I'll put the card under water and see how far I can overclock it, then flash the bios to reflect these values and retest.
None of the above will help me at all in games, and may well hinder it. I'm after making CAD applications run better, and if I can successfully imitate the £600 professional card I am well happy.
Cheers all
edit: settled on spec viewperf as a benchmark system. its drawing very pretty pictures on my screen as I type. Many views, no comments, strange
edit2:
Well boys and girls, this works. Ill see if I can produce pretty graphs once I've got some more data to plot, but preliminary results look very good. At 600 / 1500 / 900 core/shaders/memory speed which I'm pretty sure is stock for the card, increases of roughly 25% can be seen between the different bios. Solid works from 12.4 to 16.4 being one I care about. NX from 4.95 to 5.03 is unfortunate as I use solid edge most at present, but increases across the board.
Now going to repeat at my card stock of 650/1620/950. I'll leave it there until I get the card under water, but all looking good so far
edit3:
Returned card to it's factory overclocked speed and reran tests. the slow speed quadro beat the faster nvidia by a fair margin. a couple of benchmarks showed slower fps when going from slow nvidia to faster nvidia, i'm undecided whether i can be bothered to retest at the slower speeds.
Thus far failed to replicate the sources work from scratch, i managed a working bios that installed 8800gt drivers then ran like crap. Currently have a card that identifies itself as an evga fx 3700 (possible unique )and is running through spec viewperf rather nicely, but under cross examination would admit to being an nvidia referance card.
Curiously no overheating issues with any of the tests despite the card running passive. Cpu is a 2.83ghz q9550, same windows install. Process undertaken is flash, remove drivers, reboot, install drivers, reboot, test, repeat. Not surprisingly, the overclocked fx 3700 is quicker than the stock fx 3700, and I am well pleased with myself.
edit4:
Now very confused. At 600mhz, changing to quadro makes things much better. At 650mhz, changing to quadro makes things a bit better. But the 600mhz quadro outperforms all the others. I'll think on this one, presumably my processor is now getting in the way. This may take longer than I'd intended as a result
Last edited: