Maybe so but we all know nobody runs a Q6600 at 2.4GHz, 3gHz minimum or epic fail![]()
wasn't this out today? how come no performance reviews..?
I think it is UT3 where a quad 2.4 outperforms a dual 3.33. GTA 4 might be the same.
It isn't out till Wednesday.

Wait a min, but if I am below the recommended reqs, yet it is at 4.2GHz, how am I?
I have more GHz than a stock 2.4GHz quad, so if both my cores where at 100% in GTA IV compared to the quad at 2.4GHz I'd be putting out more power still to the game...
It's not about MHz though is it, it's about utilisation. more cores > more mhz in a multi core optimised environment.
I thought we established many years ago that console specs can't be compared to PC specs directly.
I use 1280x1024 on a flat panel.
My CPU is at stock because it is quick enough for everything at that speed and you can use speedstep etc, but I will overclock for GTA if necessary and if it makes a big difference.
If that was the case then there'd be no need for a quad in anything![]()
oops
had Dec 1st in my head for some reason![]()
Yes, a lot.but seriously did you actually care if you could mod your cars or not?
Graphics are also massively improved, alongside a whole muliplayer suite (which is excelent may I add).