Conspiracy theorist needs to goto Specsavers.

The original source for this story is Weekly World News.

Other stories in that esteemed chronicle include:

  • MEGAN FOX IS A MAN!

  • DAVID WILKERSON'S PROPHECY

  • PALIN BAGS A BIGFOOT

  • REPUBLICANS UNCOVER SWINE FLU CONSPIRACY

I'll leave you to join the dots.

"thecrit.com" actively pays internet users to virally spread this stuff round forums, the more established the users of a forum the more they get paid. Did you know you can even sell an established account on on a high usage forum? The 9/11 conspiracies posted recently from other sites that employ the same marketing.
 
"thecrit.com" actively pays internet users to virally spread this stuff round forums, the more established the users of a forum the more they get paid. Did you know you can even sell an established account on on a high usage forum? The 9/11 conspiracies posted recently from other sites that employ the same marketing.

Awesome does that mean magic and Telki can be banned for promoting their business?
 
286899640_l.gif
 
Just saw this thread - but how photoshopped is the photo of the scientist holding the "Angel" - even from normal size it doesn't look right but zooming in it doesn't even fit in properly!

Jeez - how do people fall for this. I think the ones that do watch too much SciFi and are wishing far too hard for it to come true.

Rich
 
Awesome does that mean magic and Telki can be banned for promoting their business?

The point where the marketing becomes a viral critical mass (more users start to believe than are need to be paid) is actually quite small, difficult for the dons to sort out. I would think post history continually referencing specific sites could do it though.

The amusing part is while we're all laughing at Telki, the amount of replies he's getting means the more hits thecrit.com gets, thus he will be paid more.
 
Amazingly, and this is documented, the US government actually backed significant research into 'remote viewing' with a programme funded to look into the effectiveness of this as an espionage tool. Needless to say this programme no longer exists (although I am sure that our cospiracy theorist friends will tell us that it worked so well it was taken underground so the Ruskies don't know we're watching them or something.) It worked so well, they stopped doing it. I think congress must have been at the crack pipe when they approved that programme.

The US got into remote viewing during the cold war when they found out the Russians had been using psychics and where having some success's.

edit: incidentally several of the people who were involved in this now make a living teaching remote viewing through costly seminars, DVDs and books - as I've said to Magick before, there's money in conspiracy just as long as there are fools who can tolerate how dull their lives are and have disposable income.

I don't dispute there are a lot of people (and charlatons) making money on the books and semiar circuits. Incidently I've downloaded and listened to a few of these remote viewing seminars, I got them for free off usenet. They are basicaly a rip-off for what they teach you. All the information about the abilities they teach you in these $1000 2-3 day seminars can be found on the net for free legaly. Ingo Swan, one of the original remote viewers, has a very good site giving you more info than they will in these seminars for free : http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/Superpowers.html
 
The US got into remote viewing during the cold war when they found out the Russians had been using psychics and where having some success's.



I don't dispute there are a lot of people (and charlatons) making money on the books and semiar circuits. Incidently I've downloaded and listened to a few of these remote viewing seminars, I got them for free off usenet. They are basicaly a rip-off for what they teach you. All the information about the abilities they teach you in these $1000 2-3 day seminars can be found on the net for free legaly. Ingo Swan, one of the original remote viewers, has a very good site giving you more info than they will in these seminars for free : http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/Superpowers.html

Yes, I know the history of remote viewing quite well having listened to Ingo Swan, Ed Dames et al for many hours on Coast to Coast. In all of that I have heard nothing which convinces me that there is a usable process.
 
The Old Ones will be here soon. Mark my words, unbelievers!

Ia! Ia! Cthulhu Fhtagn!
I for one welcome our new old overlords!

Classic conspiracy response - if the argument fails, throw some random combinations of letters at us to make us think it's some secret language. If you're going to do that, you might want to take a few lessons from Marc Okrand first. Might make things a bit more convincing that way. :)

"thecrit.com" actively pays internet users to virally spread this stuff round forums, the more established the users of a forum the more they get paid. Did you know you can even sell an established account on on a high usage forum? The 9/11 conspiracies posted recently from other sites that employ the same marketing.
Haha! Do you have evidence for this? I'd like to see them get out of that one without swift application of the banhammer of doom! :)
 
Astral Projection isn't something you'll learn over night. It can take many years.

I've heard almost all people who try it don't even manage it before they die, so it must take someone really 'special' to achieve it. Luckily, I think you're pretty 'special'. Keep trying champ, you'll get there - don't ask me how I know this, there's no evidence, but something tells it's true.
 
Amazingly, and this is documented, the US government actually backed significant research into 'remote viewing' with a programme funded to look into the effectiveness of this as an espionage tool. Needless to say this programme no longer exists (although I am sure that our cospiracy theorist friends will tell us that it worked so well it was taken underground so the Ruskies don't know we're watching them or something.) It worked so well, they stopped doing it. I think congress must have been at the crack pipe when they approved that programme.

edit: incidentally several of the people who were involved in this now make a living teaching remote viewing through costly seminars, DVDs and books - as I've said to Magick before, there's money in conspiracy just as long as there are fools who can tolerate how dull their lives are and have disposable income.

edit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing

IIRC it wasn't discontinued for lack of "results" but rather lack of results that were military applicable. There were several documented cases of degrees of extra-sensory perception but nothing that was predictable, controllable or in any way useable to gather intelligence or could have been developed for that useage.
 
"thecrit.com" actively pays internet users to virally spread this stuff round forums, the more established the users of a forum the more they get paid. Did you know you can even sell an established account on on a high usage forum? The 9/11 conspiracies posted recently from other sites that employ the same marketing.

Got any evidence for that? I've never heard of any websites doing that or that its a method used.

I would assume for me to have been spreading this "viral" news then I'd have to be using there website?
 
Got any evidence for that? I've never heard of any websites doing that or that its a method used.

I would assume for me to have been spreading this "viral" news then I'd have to be using there website?

Feel like you might be missing out on some easy money?!
 
I for one welcome our new lunar overlords. But hope they can deal with the tinfoil hat brigade as their first course of action.
 
This is nonsense purely from an evolutionary viewpoint.

The chances of two advanced, unrelated species evolving into exactly the same bipedal form is virtually nil. Not only that but both species developing a penchant for iconography with wings? Impossible, utterly impossible.

Any aliens we encounter will be, well, totally alien!

Oh, and that first photo looks photoshoped. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom