No problem.
First off, I'm not convinced that "moderate" and "Muslim" really fit together. Approval of the use of torture to enforce obedience is not exactly moderate in my opinion, and that is required in Islam. If you don't believe me, then good luck finding a Muslim who will directly oppose an explicit command from their god. I had my eyes opened by a very tolerant, charming, "moderate" Muslim when they casually expressed their enthusiastic advocacy of torturing people to death for having sex outside of marriage. I'd been fed the standard line we're all fed, namely that virtually every Muslim is nothing at all like that and is religiously opposed to all violence (despite the crowds of them who turn up to violently object to pretty much anything and threaten to kill people, but just ignore them). So I initially thought her position was an aberration, that she was a whackjob extremist who covered it up very well. After a few weeks of reading Islamic sources and failing to find any Muslim who unequivocally opposed torturing people for various trivial things (like having sex outside of marriage), I realised that the standard line that we're all fed is wrong.
But even if I was to ignore all that and pretend that the standard line is true (which it isn't), my point still stands:
Less extreme Muslims are much more likely to succeed in making the UK more Islamic, eventually making it an Islamic theocracy, than extremist Muslims are to succeed in doing so. Spewing hatred and murdering anyone unlucky enough to be in range at the time results in very widespread determined opposition. As I said before: A "moderate" approach doesn't result in such opposition, so it is much more likely to succeed. It's a timescale of decades, but it has a far greater chance of success.
In a theocracy, it is rarely moderates who wield power because it's rarely moderates who seek power.
So "moderate" Muslims are more of a threat partly because they're far, far more likely to succeed in making the UK continually more Islamic until it becomes an Islamic theocracy and partly because the "moderates" would (unintentionally) be providing a route to power to the extremists that the extremists would not be able to get by themselves.
Attempting to deflect me away with irrelevencies in quotations is not going to work. Neither is attributing your statements as mine, trying to reverse the argument instead of explaining yours is pointless.
