I consider less extreme Muslims to be more of a threat, because they're far more likely to succeed.
Please explain why this is not racist, as it says moderate muslims are a threat as they are more likely to succeed than Extremists?
Some do...and they always say that at least part of the reason they're doing so because the extremists are making Islam look bad (as the Muslim Council of Great Britain did in this case).
So what they're objecting to is not attempts to conquer the world for Islam, but what they consider to be counter-productive attempts to conquer the world for Islam.
This states that the British Muslim Council denounce these exreme acts partly because they make Islam look bad, but also because it affects their own plans at world domination. How is that not Islamophobic, you are clearly stating that the BMC which represents moderate islam in this country is part of a global plot to conquer the world.
For example, scientology is modern but just as bad as the Bronze Age stuff.
It's worse than that, because what is required is actually submission to the human authorities, backed up by their claim to divine right and by their power and willingness to inflict torture and death if that fails.
If Islam wasn't given the massively privileged status we give to accepted religions, it would be villified for sexism, use of torture, advocacy of malign control freak tyranny...the list goes on.
Islam is not a Bronze-Age religion, you should study your subject before villifiying it so.
The second part is an extremist interpretation of Islam, the majority do not believe such rubbish.
You're the one who's talking about a plot, not me.
Have you not noticed that Islam is a growing religion? Are you not aware that it includes seeking converts?
Here you deny you made such an assertion, which you clearly did in the quote above.
The fastest growing religion in Britain at the moment is Catholicism, due mainly to the influx of Eastern Europeans. All religions include seeking converts. Have you never heard of the inquistion?
First off, I'm not convinced that "moderate" and "Muslim" really fit together. Approval of the use of torture to enforce obedience is not exactly moderate in my opinion, and that is required in Islam.
Again an extremist interpretation of Islam and not followed by the majority of Muslims.
After a few weeks of reading Islamic sources and failing to find any Muslim who unequivocally opposed torturing people for various trivial things (like having sex outside of marriage), I realised that the standard line that we're all fed is wrong.
You seem to reading an awful lot of extreme views, and that you could not find a muslim willing to talk to you about such rubbish is hardly suprising.
So "moderate" Muslims are more of a threat partly because they're far, far more likely to succeed in making the UK continually more Islamic until it becomes an Islamic theocracy .
There you go again, accusing Muslims of attempting to conquer the UK and turn it into an Islamic state. Utter rubbish.
That you cannot see that your view as stated in the above quotes you made, not I, are Islamophobic is franky very disappointing.
My opinion is that The BMC is truely disgusted by the extreme views and act that a minority in its religion spread. It has no ulterior motive to make the UK or the world an Islamic State. My opinion is also that the majority of muslims do not follow the extreme version of Islam as you state is the case.
In all walks of life, whether politics, religion, sport etc there are a minority who have extreme views, this is not representative of the whole and that is the same for Islam.
I am not lying, you just cannot face the truth of what you have said.