Yet Pope Benedict, whatever one’s view of him, has conducted himself on tour with a measure of grace not visible in his opponents.
AHAHAH
she's funny.
Yet Pope Benedict, whatever one’s view of him, has conducted himself on tour with a measure of grace not visible in his opponents.
AHAHAH
she's funny.
As is Richard Dawkins...
for what?
This sums it up nicely:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...Richard-Dawkins-turning-into-Ian-Paisley.html
how would you know? you probably still haven't watched the video...
You were quite happy to talk carp while admitting you hadn't even watched it LOL
my hair is a bird, your argument is invalid.
You won't get any mainstream newspaper to come out & support Atheism even if the editor supports it but I have no doubt it will happen before long as more people stop & actually think what rubbish they have been told to believe since birth.
It's the same as the ridiculous morning prayers in the house of commons, all MP's are automatically religious are they?? no of course they're not but they are still expected to join in praying to the invisible man in what amounts to the biggest con in the history of the human race & you accuse me of talking crap,lol
Anyway this thread is degenerating into inanity so I'm out.
Richard Dawkins appears to be nominating himself as the first Pope of Atheism and by the look of that speech, you'd think atheism was some organised movement.
May I ask what your wife was taught about same sex marriages?I asked my wife, who attended a Catholic School and was bought up a Catholic whether she was as Dawkins has suggested in the past taught;
Creation over Evolution. her answer was no, she was taught Evolution.
That Condoms were useless. Her answer was no, she was taught how to put them on using a fake penis.
That Homosexuals are evil. Her answer again was no, she was taught that all people are equal.
That all other faiths are evil: Again her answer was no, she was taught about all the other religions as well as Catholicism.
Was she taught that the biblical stories, i.e Genesis/Leviticus were factual. Her answer again was no she was not, it was clear that they were allegorical.
So it would seem that some of you are indeed full of the brown stuff.
Was she taught that the biblical stories, i.e Genesis/Leviticus were factual. Her answer again was no she was not, it was clear that they were allegorical.
I asked my wife, who attended a Catholic School and was bought up a Catholic whether she was as Dawkins has suggested in the past taught;
Creation over Evolution. her answer was no, she was taught Evolution.
That Condoms were useless. Her answer was no, she was taught how to put them on using a fake penis.
That Homosexuals are evil. Her answer again was no, she was taught that all people are equal.
That all other faiths are evil: Again her answer was no, she was taught about all the other religions as well as Catholicism.
Was she taught that the biblical stories, i.e Genesis/Leviticus were factual. Her answer again was no she was not, it was clear that they were allegorical.
So it would seem that some of you are indeed full of the brown stuff.
Too trueRunning away from reading the truth no doubt![]()
May I ask what your wife was taught about same sex marriages?
but they are not evil, neither is the Pope.
Too true