Soldato
Everything you said is true, And amd have done a good job, Except for pricing.
And availability.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Everything you said is true, And amd have done a good job, Except for pricing.
And availability.
I think that's the main issue. Supply is non-existent and that only means places are going to gouge the price.
Very impressive performance from the Fury Pro.
The Witcher 3 @2160p looks a bit choppy though after playing it on a pile of TXs.
The settings are cranked. The 4GB isn't an issue.
2160p
1 GPU
- Score 25.8 GPU Fury X @1125/625, CPU 5960X @4.0, AMDMatt Link Mantle 15.15 Drivers
- Score 25.3 GPU 980 Ti @1350/1850, CPU 5930k @3.5, Clov!s Link DX11 353.30 Drivers
- Score 21.6 GPU 290X @1250/1625, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link Mantle 14.9 Drivers
- Score 21.2 GPU 290X @1270/1625, CPU 4930k @4.0, Kaapstad Link Mantle 14.9 Drivers
- Score 20.8 GPU 290X @1250/1625, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
- Score 20.6 GPU 290X @1280/1625, CPU 4930k @4.0, Kaapstad Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
- Score 20.5 GPU 290P @1235/1625, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link Mantle 14.9 Drivers
- Score 18.5 GPU 980 @1502/2000, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad Link DX11 344.75 Drivers
- Score 17.1 GPU 295X2 @1018/1250, CPU 5960X @4.0, AMDMatt Link Mantle 14.12 Drivers
- Score 16.5 GPU 295X2 @1018/1250, CPU 5960X @4.0, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.12 Drivers
2 GPUs
- Score 40.3 GPU 290X @1240/1625, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
- Score 39.8 GPU 290X @1230/1625, CPU 4930k @4.8, Kaapstad Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
- Score 32.1 GPU 295X2 @1018/1250, CPU 5960X @4.0, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.12 Drivers
- Score 27.4 GPU 980 @1550/2053, CPU 3930k @5.0, Besty Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
- Score 19.9 GPU 7990 @1175/1700, CPU 5960X @4.9, AMDMatt Link DX11 15.43 Drivers
3 GPUs
4 GPUs
- Score 99.1 GPU TitanX @1452/2002, CPU 5960X @4.5, Kaapstad Link DX11 353.06 Drivers
- Score 78.1 GPU 290X @1225/1625, CPU 5960X @4.4, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.11.2 Drivers
- Score 74.6 GPU 295X2 @1215/1625, CPU 5960X @4.9, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.12 Drivers
- Score 66.1 GPU 980 @1472/2002, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad Link DX11 347.09 Drivers
- Score 54.8 GPU 980 @1530/2000, CPU 3930k @5.0, Besty Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
- Score 48.3 GPU nvTitan @981/1752, CPU 3930k @4.0, Kaapstad Link DX11 344.11 Drivers
The settings are cranked. The 4GB isn't an issue.
Almost forgot,
Why were they using an i7 5960X @3.5ghz for 4 card setups, epic fail.
Not really, if you look at the single card specs at the bottom the Fury X is within a percentage of the 980ti.That's just listing the specs. He might have OC'd, but I can't read Korean so gleaning any of those kind of details is impossible.
I could go on, but it's total domination for Fury X, The settings are cranked. The 4GB isn't an issue.
*fanboyism*
That's just listing the specs. He might have OC'd, but I can't read Korean so gleaning any of those kind of details is impossible.
I'm not saying that the Fury series do not scale very well in multi GPU setups but it looks so far as if the test setups have not been maxed out like we would run things and more like setup to give certain results.
I could go on, but it's total domination for Fury X.
Now imagine drivers + voltage.