Goods 'dispatched' but not shipped - legals

So again, how can something be dispatched if they didnt have it?

Well, obviously they didnt have it. Probably a stock control error.

Again, it doesnt matter. They have accounted for this scenario in the contract and they have followed the terms of the contract when it did occur so I dont see how you can still claim they are in breach of contract?
 
Because the terms aren't applicable until the goods are dispatched. Which they've lied and said they are when they clearly couldn't have been.

That's not a stock control error. It's either very poor management or a deliberate lie.
 
Because the terms aren't applicable until the goods are dispatched. Which they've lied and said they are when they clearly couldn't have been.

As we've already established in this thread, the contract terms are applicable from the point where they send the email saying the goods are "being dispatched" (I dont know if that is the same email as the one the OP refers to as "been dispatched" or not). They sent that email, so the terms apply.
 
Right. But those terms are superceded at point of dispatch. Which the company stated had happened (bringing in to effect new terms) when it actually couldn't have.
 
As we've already established in this thread, the contract terms are applicable from the point where they send the email saying the goods are "being dispatched" (I dont know if that is the same email as the one the OP refers to as "been dispatched" or not). They sent that email, so the terms apply.

Once the contract is formed, in this case using their definition, the contract has been formed.
Normal contract law will take precedence at this point where T&Cs breach the law they are simply struck through as if they never existed. You can improve someones position against the law you cannot worsen it.
The laws surrounding contract formation are very old and very well tested, you cannot unravel a formed contract by a simple ooops sorry we made a mistake and are unforming/cancelling your contract to avoid a problem at our end, where a simple remedy exists. If a simple remedy doesnt exist, expect to get sued so that the other party can put themselves into the same position as they would have been had the contract been delivered as agreed.

They formed the contract by saying that had shipped, they needed to under contract law make this good. They did. Simple.
 
Except you could have a contract where it says if x happens we can cancel it. I've not looked at what people above are spacking about, but you could have course have such a term in a contract.

Yes of course you can but they dont

They have T&Cs in regards that placing an order does not form a contract against them. They are quite clear that they can cancel the ORDER anytime for pretty much any reason up until they send shipment confirmation when they deem the contract to have been formed.
This is completely reasonable so they have plenty of time to identify pricing errors, stock errors etc.
When they send confirmation they have shipped its pretty clear they deem to contract to have been formed and completed.
Why would they want to cancel the contract after its been shipped? There is no logical reason, so they have setup their systems to give them the furthest possible point down the chain to form the contract.
 
By their definition they have not formed a contract until they have shipped the goods.

You're wrong. It specifically says the contract is formed when they send the email:
the formation of a contract between you and Us will take place when We send you an email confirming that the products you have ordered are being dispatched to you

There may also be a difference between their "Being dispatched" and "have been dispatched" emails.
"Being dispatched" could be the point at which your payment has cleared and they have instructed the warehouse to pick and send your items - so they will only find out stock errors after this point.
 
Last edited:
You're wrong. It specifically says the contract is formed when they send the email:


There may also be a difference between their "Being dispatched" and "have been dispatched" emails.
"Being dispatched" could be the point at which your payment has cleared and they have instructed the warehouse to pick and send your items - so they will only find out stock errors after this point.

The company took it seriously they set up a dedicated help line and fired over kegal disclaimers stating that accepting the remedy would thetrfire render me ubable to take further legal action
 
You're wrong. It specifically says the contract is formed when they send the email:


There may also be a difference between their "Being dispatched" and "have been dispatched" emails.
"Being dispatched" could be the point at which your payment has cleared and they have instructed the warehouse to pick and send your items - so they will only find out stock errors after this point.

Well yes i was paraphrasing to avoid have to repeat their exact description constantly.

I don't believe they send a "being dispatched email", I have never used a company that does this, on websites yes but never received a mail saying this.
I mean inferring that its part way through their process but not yet at the point they know they may not be able to send it. Its silly terminology on their point.
Probably by someone trying to be smart to eliminate any issues with mispricing and being able to cancel orders.
I believe they like all others I have ever dealt with send a dispatched email, which means normally they have gone far enough through their system that they know it will be shiped that day, or for some, was shipped that day.
 
Last edited:
is it from game? they had a thing where the people had a dedicated hotline ontill the 12th I think and they get a slim £20 psn voucher and now tv for the £149.

ill see if I can find a link.
 
Back
Top Bottom