alliance between Islamist type of politics and the left.

Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Nov 2005
Posts
13,915
Endless voting on the matter, particularly as the issue develops and knowledge expands, would be the democratic thing to do.

It offends the principles of certainty and finality, but that's completely different to anti-democratic.
You cannot endlessly vote, nothing gets done that way.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
5 Dec 2003
Posts
20,999
Location
Just to the left of my PC
umm, so they would stop blowing stuff up? Whats a stable Islam anyway? The ideology is terrible, hence the situation we're in.

umm, why on Earth would they stop blowing stuff up? The whole point of Islam is gaining power by fear and force, that's what it was created for. Without effective internal conflict within Islam, we would have a world war and we would probably lose. Then everyone would lose apart from a tiny elite of the most brutal, violently sociopathic people who would be the ones who ended up with all the power in a global authoritarian state because they'd be the people who would take the power. It wouldn't be ordinary muslims who ended up in power - they would just be a tool used by those people and they'd be oppressed too. An utterly authoritarian ideology that succeeds creates an utterly authoritarian state and power will end up in the hands of those who take it by force and use it oppressively.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2005
Posts
5,996
Location
Essex
I thought Switzerland had a form of direct democracy?

It does have semi-direct democracy, and a couple of their cantons have an even "purer" form of direct democracy. But even they still elect officials to represent them, because people generally have better things to do with their lives than decide everything!
 
Back
Top Bottom