Soldato
Poll: Abu Dhabi Grand Prix 2021, Yas Island - Race 22
- Thread starter Shimmy
- Start date
- Status
Guys, please, you don’t understand. Allow us to explain it to you
Soldato
Ahh the FIA gaslighting has begun! I kinda hope some teams boycott round 1 next year.
Until they sort out the wrong person being gifted the WDC instead of winning it in the race under the rules, it's all just empty words.
Commissario
Let's look at the stats then.
Lewis and Michael have won the same number of championships. Lewis has more wins and more pole positions. Out of the other six categories, Michael is lower than Lewis on four of them.
Would you like to rethink your comment about Michael Schumacher being the greatest of all time? Because, as you say, stats ARE everything in sport.
Soldato
Utter b*****ks and completely tone deaf. Yet we wonder why the pinnacle championship of motorsport is in this mess in the first place.
<insert epic facepalm gif here>
Soldato
The conspiracy I read was that he was under fuelled so he could potentially disrupt Hamiltons race at the start. He had to retire as he was running out of fuel.
Soldato
The official reason was loss of oil and water pressure but Perez had no idea, I think those would have created a warning message on the dash.
Soldato
So Schumacher wasn't in a dominating Ferrari?
Commissario
They’re not doing themselves any favours at all there.
Would that even be legal/would it be checked even though he retired?
Didn’t Mercedes only need 17 points from the race to secure the WCC? So Hamilton finishing second would have done it regardless of where Perez finished.
Or was it 17 points more than RBR?
Deleted member 651465
D
Deleted member 651465
It's a badly written statement.
For instance, the mention that it was Latifi's Williams was wholly unnecessary and only really serves to incite anger towards him (not that I've seen any anger toward him, but still). After all, why not just say "...The circumstances surrounding the use of the Safety Car following the incident on lap 53, and the related communications..."
For instance, the mention that it was Latifi's Williams was wholly unnecessary and only really serves to incite anger towards him (not that I've seen any anger toward him, but still). After all, why not just say "...The circumstances surrounding the use of the Safety Car following the incident on lap 53, and the related communications..."
Soldato
Prepare for the white wash, however is this not an admission that the rules and precedents were not followed.
This is not going to wash with the fans at all that is their problem they are so out of touch.
While I'm on, how does it look when a bunch of middle aged white men blatantly manipulate the result so that a young white man driving for a team run by middle aged white men wins against Lewis who's message is constantly you can achieve your dreams keep working. I hope nobody in the wider world picks up on this.
People are going to say don't dare pull the race card, but if it walks like a duck etc.
I say this as an oldish white man who by no means supports the blm stuff.
Soldato
I think it was austria where Schumacher embarrassingly pushed Ruben's on to the top step because the crowd booed so much.
It's a badly written statement.
For instance, the mention that it was Latifi's Williams was wholly unnecessary and only really serves to incite anger towards him (not that I've seen any anger toward him, but still). After all, why not just say "...The circumstances surrounding the use of the Safety Car following the incident on lap 53, and the related communications..."
Why would the FIA take responsibility when they can point fingers at everyone else? That's what they always do.
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Aug 2013
- Posts
- 223
That is hilarious
LMAO^
Soldato
The fia can only recover some respect from this by fessing up and apologising.
Caporegime
Have you heard of pouring oil on troubled waters? This is pouring oil on troubled fires.
- Status