Erm. Answer is a pipe wrench ?
Its over the front axle of your ****** long ass Mercedes isn't it? Go on. Be honest.
Erm. Answer is a pipe wrench ?
Because of material incompatibility that will degrade hoses etc. over time, not because the engine won't run.
But all that is different is 3% energy loss, no?
Derp.
Besides, I haven't mentioned lab results, i'm asking you to provide some sort of logic to explain how 2 or 3% less energy results in 20% less economy. Can you?
If you want me provide science I cannot do that
36mpg -> 28mpg
Car: Vauxhall Astra 1.4T 150 Auto
First ~15k miles of ownership: 36mpg
~250 miles since my first E10 fill up: 28mpg
Pretty big difference, wonder if it's worth getting premium fuel.
Hard to see how this is environmentally worthwhile either, which was meant to be the point of it.
First ~15k miles of ownership: 36mpg
~250 miles since my first E10 fill up: 28mpg
Pretty big difference, wonder if it's worth getting premium fuel.
I'm claiming my average MPG went from 24 to 18 over the course of 2 tanks.
Going to 98 RON my MPG returned to 24.
Derp.
That's absolutely your choice. But disregarding what I say because it doesn't fit in line with your understanding that has been made from skewed data, isn't accurate or logical.
BMWIts over the front axle of your ****** long ass Mercedes isn't it? Go on. Be honest.
15k is like 3 years mileage for me, so all seasons.Was the first 15k in the middle of winter as well? Otherwise it's not really valid...
15k is like 3 years mileage for me, so all seasons.
Winter has only barely started here though - so my E10 miles are in average uk weather.
lol what's your problem, it's perfectly valid. if you have nothing helpful to say just go away.So not valid. Taa.
lol what's your problem, it's perfectly valid. if you have nothing helpful to say just go away.
To be honest the data sets are too varied to compare. If you were comparing 250 miles in December from 3 years ago with 250 miles from December this year then the comparison would be more relevant. Even then though I'd say that one tank isn't enough of a sample rate.lol what's your problem, it's perfectly valid. if you have nothing helpful to say just go away.
I haven't seen anyone attacked. I've seen people unable to respond factually to doubts raised, but you are correct about people getting mad in return when unable to justify claims further. Perhaps they need to learn how to respond appropriately as opposed to throwing handbags...?but get attacked, so get mad in return