Energy Prices (Strictly NO referrals!)

except it's not black and white like you assume -
if the gas drives up the elexon auction price , government gets a refund on the excess wind farm monies over cfd/strike (like 5p/kwh)
but would pay compensation in over production situation - strike price as discussed

eg
The UK government has secured a record number of clean energy projects in its latest renewables auction, AR6, marking a significant step towards its goal of delivering clean power by 2030. The auction, the sixth of its kind, resulted in 131 new projects across the country, which will collectively generate enough electricity to power 11 million homes.

This auction saw a major turnaround from the disappointing 2023 round, where no offshore wind projects were approved. The government responded by increasing the auction budget by 50%, leading to a resurgence in offshore wind, with nine contracts awarded, including the largest wind farms in Europe, Hornsea 3 and Hornsea 4, off the Yorkshire coast.

*Here’s a summary of the results:

- The 400 MW Green Volt Floating Offshore Windfarm (GV01) project located in Scotland, with an estimated delivery year of 2028/29 and a strike price of £139.93/MWh.

- The Inch Cape A (177.41 MW) & B (88.70 MW) offshore wind projects located in Scotland, with an estimated delivery year of 2027/28 and a strike price of £54.23/MWh.

- The 73.50 MW Moray Offshore Windfarm (West) String 9 project located in Scotland, with an estimated delivery year of 2027/28 and a strike price of £54.23/MWh.

- The 158.90 MW EA3B offshore wind project located in England, with an estimated delivery year of 2027/28 and a strike price of £54.23/MWh.

- The (360 MW each) Hornsea Project Three (AR6 A, B, C) offshore wind projects located in England, each with an estimated delivery date of 2027/28 and a strike price of £54.23/MWh.

- The 2400 MW Hornsea Project Four offshore wind project located in England, with an estimated delivery year of 2028/29 and a strike price of £58.87/MWh.

- The 963.07 MW East Anglia Two, Phase 1 offshore wind project located in England, with an estimated delivery date of 2028/29 and a strike price of £58.87/MWh.

*The strike price in a Contracts for Difference (CfD) agreement represents the guaranteed price per megawatt-hour (£/MWh) that the generator will receive for the electricity it produces. If the market price is below the strike price, the government compensates the difference to the generator. If the market price is above the strike price, the generator pays back the difference. This mechanism provides financial stability for renewable energy projects by protecting against volatile market prices.
 
Nothing you have written contracts what I wrote.

Less than half of the UK's installed capacity is on CFD contract and as we all know, wind turbines are rarley actually producing at their name plate capacity. Gas IS setting the price most of the time, just because a some wind turbines have to pay a bit back doesn't change the fact gas is setting the price.

When gas isn't setting the price, those on the CFD contracts are being subsidised so a big chunk of that money they pay back, they get back via that mechanism.
 
Is it just me or is anyone else really fed up with this constant rise after rise?

Are they genuine or are they really genuinely just taking the **** now?

It doesn’t just stop at energy either, but am I just stuck in a bubble or are these rises annoying ?

Did you miss the drop of £130 in July? So £-130 +£30 = -£100 they are still £100 lower that they were up until then
 

The company received £869m in public subsidies last year, but this is set to fall to £470m according to the government.

In February, Environment Secretary Ed Miliband extended pre-existing taxpayer support for the firm by agreeing to hand Drax another £2billion over the next four years.

Miliband and the Government were 'guilty of aiding and abetting' the pollution caused by Drax, adding: 'Miliband and the UK Government gave Drax a £2 billion incentive to continue robbing poor people of the right to breathe clean air and drink clean water.'

Drax's activities have come under heavy scrutiny from local US officials. Earlier this month, Mississippi authorities turned down an application from the company to increase the amount of pollution it is legally allowed to emit from the Gloster plant.
 
Last edited:

The company received £869m in public subsidies last year, but this is set to fall to £470m according to the government.

In February, Environment Secretary Ed Miliband extended pre-existing taxpayer support for the firm by agreeing to hand Drax another £2billion over the next four years.

Miliband and the Government were 'guilty of aiding and abetting' the pollution caused by Drax, adding: 'Miliband and the UK Government gave Drax a £2 billion incentive to continue robbing poor people of the right to breathe clean air and drink clean water.'

Drax's activities have come under heavy scrutiny from local US officials. Earlier this month, Mississippi authorities turned down an application from the company to increase the amount of pollution it is legally allowed to emit from the Gloster plant.
Care to post an opinion rather than being an RSS feed (again)?
 
What’s the alternative? Durn off Drax and have electric shortages over winter?

That’s exactly what will happen if it isn’t making electricity.

Could you imagine the telegraph headlines then? ‘Miliband rolling blackout chaos’ with the byline ‘miliband’s green agenda breaks Britain’s grid and it’s costing you hundreads’

The irony is your beloved conservatives set this whole scenario up and paid Drax billions to burn virgin wood shipped in from Canada. They then try to blame Milliband personally when the house of cards all fall down.

It’s blatant rage bait for the gullible and the hard of thinking.
 
What’s the alternative? Durn off Drax and have electric shortages over winter?

That’s exactly what will happen if it isn’t making electricity.

Could you imagine the telegraph headlines then? ‘Miliband rolling blackout chaos’ with the byline ‘miliband’s green agenda breaks Britain’s grid and it’s costing you hundreads’

The irony is your beloved conservatives set this whole scenario up and paid Drax billions to burn virgin wood shipped in from Canada. They then try to blame Milliband personally when the house of cards all fall down.

It’s blatant rage bait for the gullible and the hard of thinking.

I just looking at the money side of it, billions given but prices are still high.
 
indeed. whilst I think Drax is a con in terms of green energy and should be thought of on the same lines as fossil fuels when thinking clean Vs dirty generation , you don't just turn off what is dependable energy.
I want a clean grid..... but I don't want black or brownouts in peak times or dull but still days either. it will take years to transition the grid and the issue with fossil fuels has been known about since late 1970s. . Blaming 1 person or even 1 party about it now is v dishonest.
does milliband have all the answers? maybe not but at least he is trying to do what needs to be done and getting experts in renewables onboard to help like Greg Jackson is imo the right way
 
Last edited:
I just looking at the money side of it, billions given but prices are still high.
Fossil fuels are also subsidised, do you get het up over those also?

Edit: For example, we give tax breaks to North Sea oil and gas companies for decommissioning their infrastructure in the North Sea once the well has dried up rather than them abandoning it and just leaving it in place to rot.

This is otherwise known as paying oil and gas companies to clean up the mess they made while making £bn’s of profit from the previous liquid gold.
 
Last edited:
Re nuclear, one of the biggest players are EDF no?

They're fully state owned by France.

Why is state owned a bad idea in the UK unless it's another state? I mean they won't be making a loss otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.

Or am I missing something?
 
Re nuclear, one of the biggest players are EDF no?

They're fully state owned by France.

Why is state owned a bad idea in the UK unless it's another state? I mean they won't be making a loss otherwise they wouldn't be doing it.

Or am I missing something?
No, you are not missing anything.

The profit made by EDF in the U.K. subsidises French citizens energy bills. That said, their stake in Sizewell C is a minority IIRC but they developed the stations we are using.
 
Last edited:
Fossil fuels are also subsidised, do you get het up over those also?

The point I am making for the last 20 years they promised it would bring lower prices but it hadn't.
I not into energy or have knowledge about energy..

I see nothing we have been told materialise and I doubt it will.
 
The point I am making for the last 20 years they promised it would bring lower prices but it hadn't.
I not into energy or have knowledge about energy..

I see nothing we have been told materialise and I doubt it will.

Imagine what prices would have been if we hadn’t created all this crazy cheap energy!
 
Back
Top Bottom