Unfortunately the non-law abiding are huge in number, and they vote too.
Anyway who else do you vote for. Do we think Labour would be any tougher on crime. We know they aren't.
The current police force is a Labour police force, decimated in numbers of "real police", less training, less power and Labour has allowed this culture of blame and PC rubbish to take over in the past decade leaving the police completely unable to do their job.
Likewise the police have been having this corruption issue which has led to senior people leaving their jobs, things that all happened under Labour in the past decade. ITs Labour that taught kids they should have things for free, not have to work, and scared our police force into being bystanders.
In fairness, they've done great, they are having bricks thrown at their heads, people throwing bottles and various other things at them and despite very small numbers in numerous locations have done a fantastic job. What they need is overwhelming force, and they haven't had that.
Cameron hasn't been fantastic, but he shouldn't need to, the PM shouldn't have to hold the police chief's hand and tell him to call up every reserve, everyone on leave, everyone everywhere and get them into work. Cameron appoints a police chief, who should have been doing that, if the chief isn't there(he resigned, did he leave yet, I have no idea whats going on there tbh), the next most senior police chief should have been making that call.
Everyones scared to do everything, if the police chief authorised armoured vehicles to be used to scare people off, and someone gets run over, the media, the public, will crucify him. These days everyone passes the buck upwards while everything around them is burning.
Its pathetic that Cameron should be sorting this out, the police should have got their **** together on their own, thats their damned job, they are just too scared to do it.