Bad women, bad! No sex for them unless they are prepared to have their life ruined.
Use a condom? Get any other type of contraception? Seems to work for the rest of us.
Bad women, bad! No sex for them unless they are prepared to have their life ruined.
All forms of contraception can fail.Use a condom? Get any other type of contraception? Seems to work for the rest of us.
I'd agree - he's a straight-up nutjob like most libertarians; the religious qualifier is unnecessary.People painting Ron Paul as aa religious nutjob is tiresome as well, he really isn't.
True, but I watch TYT, who give him fair coverage, and they haven't mentioned him for a while.The majority of media in the US is either suppressing coverage of how well Paul is doing or blacking him out entirely.
People complain politicians don't listen and force things through, they change their views as they mature or public wishes change and they get blasted for that too :/It's just a shame that you can find so much videos and accounts of him claiming to have near opposite views to what he has now,
He has publicly stated though that if pregnancy occurs through something like rape then they should have the choice to abort and do it ASAP.
Unlike others who are totally against it and those who are totally for it to cover peoples mistakes and avoid complications like this.
What if the Russians had military bases in Canada? What if Australia ruled the world? What if the moon really is made of blue cheese? We can play the 'idiotic questions' game all day.
I don't have an automatic problem with a politician doing either of those, but politicians get lambasted for everything they do, from someone. It's just the nature of what they do.People complain politicians don't listen and force things through, they change their views as they mature or public wishes change and they get blasted for that too :/
Actually Vermin Supreme should be the UN Director General, would be MUCH more enjoyable to see the UN doing things then.
I don't have an automatic problem with a politician doing either of those, but politicians get lambasted for everything they do, from someone. It's just the nature of what they do.
I still think Mitt is the best candidate for the GOP, but compare the views he was espousing in 1994 (Senate run against Ted Kennedy), 2003 (governorship against Jane Swift) and now. It isn't simply changing the tone of his remarks to make them more palatable for different audiences, or changing his mind due to a revolt from the pubic, it's taking polar opposite positions, in order to win different elections. It's called opportunism, and I don't like it.
Ron Paul is a racist gay hating nutter just like the rest of them. Please take the Paul circle jerk to reddit.