Olympic female badminton players face charges

Associate
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Posts
292
Funny thing is, they probably would have got away with it if they weren't so stupidly blatant about it.

The format needs a serious rethink.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
13,308
Location
Belfast
I find it kind of fascinating, because the same thing has happened in other sports before, and there doesn't appear to be any perfect way of stopping it. When you have two places going from a group to a knockout, there's always the possibility of some shenanigans. As said above, the only reason they really got caught is that they were so obvious.

Maybe a repêchage/double-elimination system would be the best way forwards? Trouble is it doubles the number of games from a normal knockout setup.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Mar 2007
Posts
37,146
Location
Surrey
moving into knock-out stage now so further shenanigans are not possible.

Yeah but what about the games that would have included the teams disqualified? Are they promoting other teams from their groups through, or just declaring the first knockout rounds they would have been in as a forfeit?
 
Associate
Joined
22 Apr 2011
Posts
1,176
Teams who were previously knocked out, have been moved up in the rankings. I believe the top 8 teams went though, so everyone below knocked out teams moved up
 
Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
871
it's in poor taste but i wouldn't call it cheating. They did enough to qualify so were holding back.

It's the same as all the swimmers we've been watching holding back during prelims and giving their all for the finals (Phelps first race he qualified in 8th place). It's perfectly acceptable to everyone but what is the difference?
 
Associate
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Posts
292
Not exactly cheating I agree but I think what they did goes far beyond holding back and that's the problem.

Imagine a football match where both teams are repeatedly scoring own goals in an attempt to lose the game, that's the level of "holding back" on display here.

They were so blatant about it that it could not be ignored, the IOC had to act and punished them for it.
 

NZB

NZB

Associate
Joined
18 Jul 2012
Posts
2,273
Yu Yang has quit the sport after the disqualifications yesterday.

While i thought the whole thing was disgusting i can't help but think the Chinese especially would have been forced to play those matches the way they did. It's a shame for those athletes in a way.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,101
Yu Yang has quit the sport after the disqualifications yesterday.

While i thought the whole thing was disgusting i can't help but think the Chinese especially would have been forced to play those matches the way they did. It's a shame for those athletes in a way.

Indeed, its not like we don't see football teams rest players after qualifying or an F1 driver let a team-mate past because he needs the points more. This thing happens all the time in sport yet these players are being penalised after working their behinds off for 4 years to get here, its very sad, even more so considering the Chinese would have been following instruction from the team leaders :(
 
Associate
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
819
Location
South Wales
I think the whole thing has been a farce and I cannot believe how much emphasis has been put on punishing the players. It is the rule makers/organisers that should ultimately be ashamed and punished for ruining the Olympic Badminton.

They made the situation impossible for the players. I would argue that Olympians are there to get medals and those medals should only be obtainable by competing at one's best. Regardless of whether you think they should always be playing at their best, the players are going to know that if they lose a certain match, they will end up better off. With this knowledge in anyone's head, there is no encouragement to try and win the game. All the players in those matches were in this position and the badminton played in those games by all players would be negatively effected as a result, regardless of whether or not they appeared to be trying.

I very much doubt that the idea to lose the matches was solely down to the players. I expect team coaches were just as aware and advising the players.

I do think the players should have dealt with the situation by refusing to play and making an official complaint about the format, rather than putting on a poor show. I think this would have gained them more respect.

I still can't help but feel sorry for them. These young people had the weight of their country, family, friends and coaches on their shoulders to get the best result possible and they were put in an impossible situation. Now they are being lynched.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
13 Feb 2003
Posts
6,157
There is a massive difference between taking it easy and actively trying to lose. They all did the latter and I'm glad they've been DQ'd
 
Associate
Joined
14 Mar 2012
Posts
682
it's in poor taste but i wouldn't call it cheating. They did enough to qualify so were holding back.

It's the same as all the swimmers we've been watching holding back during prelims and giving their all for the finals (Phelps first race he qualified in 8th place). It's perfectly acceptable to everyone but what is the difference?

There's a massive difference. It would be the equivalent of Phelps just jumping in the pool and not even bothering to swim. Besides, Phelps is a bad example as he was going for many events, and knowingly "did enough" to get through and conserve as much energy as possible. If all the top swimmers really went for it in the 1st round, the same top swimmers would more than likely still qualify in the same order but just at a quicker time.

Personally, as someone who has always been competitive and played in a fair amount of racket sport tournaments, with a "train to win" mentality - it really saddened me to see this. Imagine going to see that shocking display of "sportsmanship"
 
Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
871
There's a massive difference. It would be the equivalent of Phelps just jumping in the pool and not even bothering to swim. Besides, Phelps is a bad example as he was going for many events, and knowingly "did enough" to get through and conserve as much energy as possible. If all the top swimmers really went for it in the 1st round, the same top swimmers would more than likely still qualify in the same order but just at a quicker time.

Personally, as someone who has always been competitive and played in a fair amount of racket sport tournaments, with a "train to win" mentality - it really saddened me to see this. Imagine going to see that shocking display of "sportsmanship"


i don't see it as the equivalent you described. Still using swimming as a comparison I would consider the previous round robin matches to be part of the "prelim" and this last match which they gave no effort is like the last few lengths. They also "knowingly did enough to get through". They've done enough previously to qualify and were holding back to save strength and be in a tactically more advantageous position. Ironically they were playing to "win" the tournament by trying to lose the match. I see it more as the fault of the federation that choose this format.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom