With respect, it's perfectly acceptable to assume your second opening of the review could have been retrieved from a cached copy. No need to go off on one.
You pointed out an error in a review and they admitted and made attempts to correct it.
Can I also ask, if Vortez review the Kraken X60 and it does in fact perform under what the H100i acheives, will you be posting a thread with an apology to Vortez regarding the accusation of false representation ?
No I do not owe Vortez and apopogy.
And I did not recover a cashed copy already on my computer. I was very careful to get a new download view of Vortez and then to final page of review. Mishima posted it was changed before it had been completely done. If I had opened it a minute or two later it may well have been corrected. But it was not when I checked and posted back here. A few minute later it was corrected and I said it was.
David Mitchelson (mishima) wrote "The Hydro Series H100i outperforms anything currently on the market and attains the moniker it has been given ‘Extreme’." and Vortez posted it. This was not a typo or misprint. It was thought out and written by David and published by Vortez. It is a false statement.. and it was posted up on their website for 21 + hours for all to read and believe until I called them on it. Hopefully Nzxt doesn't loose anything because of this. But the fact remains it was an unsubstantiated statement claiming the H100i was better than anything currently on the market... and that is not the truth at this time. Vortez has not tested and reviewed the Kraken X60 so cannot say H100i is better even if it may be. Even if Vortez reviews the Kraken X60 and it performs under the H100i it doen't carry a lot of credibility. Why? Because their false statement made and brought to light here has already severely damaged Vortez's credibility with people who know they made the false statement.
Is it possible the Kraken X60 is not as good as H100i? Yes. But it is not probable considering it's radiator is 35% bigger and hoses pumps look similar are likely to perform similarly.
I do not owe Vortez an apology.
But David Mitchelson owes everyone everywhere in the computer community and Vortez an apology for writing it. And Vortez owes everyone everywhere in the computer community an apology for publishing it.
And I have seen nothing but a thanks for catching the false statement.
