Thanks, four out of six broken, so I have only 8GB (2x4GB dual channel) working of a total 16GB. It's a deal breaker because I do a lot of productivity tasks and of course the RAM wasn't cheap.
When you say you do a lot of productivity tasks, are you actually using stuff that would bottleneck on dual-channel? because 99.9% of software doesn't actually need more than dual hence why modern and future mainstream i7's use dual, it was mostly a marketing thing for X58, just like quad on X79 when practically nothing could utilize it (and quad DDR4 on X99 when the is nothing that comes close to needing it).
If your two working slots are on separate channels you can work around the problem by selling the 4x4GB kit and buying a 2x8GB one, in fact doing so may actually give equal performance to tri channel anyway (two 2133MHz sticks is better than three 1333MHz sticks, two 2400MHz sticks is better than three 1600MHz sticks, etc).
Anyone know the equivalent X99 chips?
The isn't really an equivalence thing for X99 as they dropped the quad cores and moved to hex and octo, but I will try and sum it up:
5820K: Hex core with HT, 15MB L3, 3.3-3.6GHz, at stock this will beat any X58 CPU even if it's over clocked (within reason) the reason it's the budget of the X99 line is due to its reduced PCI-E lanes, limiting you to two graphics cards.
5930K: As above but with enough PCI-E lanes for four graphics cards, and runs at 3.5-3.7GHz.
5960X: Octo core with HT, 20MB L3, 3.0-3.5GHz, the daddy of X99.