• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Fury Pro Fiji Owners Thread

Permabanned
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Posts
9,221
Location
Knowhere
I just spent a few hours playing games with stock clocks, I spent time on the Bf4 campaign, Dying Light and Crysis 3 and real temp recorded a max of 53 degrees for the Sapphire Fury Tri-X. Earlier on a ten minute Furmark stress test with an 1100 overclock only reached 56 degrees. Plus it's silent, Coming from a 94 degree MSI 290x gaming I'm very happy.

A few comparison benches for the 290x Gaming and Fury Tri-x.

Gamename, 290x, Fury, min/avg/max

Fc2 115/156/240, 118/152/239,

Sleep Dog 37/52/63, 43/62/76,

Hitman Abs 46/57/182, 52/65/80,

Tomb Raider 64/87/114, 78/101/128,

Alien Iso 4/111/239, 5/127/180,

Res Evil 6 14307, 15876,

Apart from Far cry 2's bench where the 290x wins the Fury managed an okay lead but it wasn't massive and it make me wonder where the 390x fit's in here, I've got another 6 benches to test but they not that important really for me the switch was a massive win thanks to the improvements between temps and noise.

Although not cheap I'm very happy with the Fury and I'm glad I got it to replace Hawaii.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2010
Posts
4,967
Location
Aberdeenshire
I just spent a few hours playing games with stock clocks, I spent time on the Bf4 campaign, Dying Light and Crysis 3 and real temp recorded a max of 53 degrees for the Sapphire Fury Tri-X. Earlier on a ten minute Furmark stress test with an 1100 overclock only reached 56 degrees. Plus it's silent, Coming from a 94 degree MSI 290x gaming I'm very happy.

A few comparison benches for the 290x Gaming and Fury Tri-x.

Gamename, 290x, Fury, min/avg/max

Fc2 115/156/240, 118/152/239,

Sleep Dog 37/52/63, 43/62/76,

Hitman Abs 46/57/182, 52/65/80,

Tomb Raider 64/87/114, 78/101/128,

Alien Iso 4/111/239, 5/127/180,

Res Evil 6 14307, 15876,

Apart from Far cry 2's bench where the 290x wins the Fury managed an okay lead but it wasn't massive and it make me wonder where the 390x fit's in here, I've got another 6 benches to test but they not that important really for me the switch was a massive win thanks to the improvements between temps and noise.

Although not cheap I'm very happy with the Fury and I'm glad I got it to replace Hawaii.

Is this at 1080p? Its a decent boost but the difference will be more clear at higher resolution. You should try at 1440p.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Jul 2003
Posts
30,062
Location
In a house
I just spent a few hours playing games with stock clocks, I spent time on the Bf4 campaign, Dying Light and Crysis 3 and real temp recorded a max of 53 degrees for the Sapphire Fury Tri-X. Earlier on a ten minute Furmark stress test with an 1100 overclock only reached 56 degrees. Plus it's silent, Coming from a 94 degree MSI 290x gaming I'm very happy.

A few comparison benches for the 290x Gaming and Fury Tri-x.

Gamename, 290x, Fury, min/avg/max

Fc2 115/156/240, 118/152/239,

Sleep Dog 37/52/63, 43/62/76,

Hitman Abs 46/57/182, 52/65/80,

Tomb Raider 64/87/114, 78/101/128,

Alien Iso 4/111/239, 5/127/180,

Res Evil 6 14307, 15876,

Apart from Far cry 2's bench where the 290x wins the Fury managed an okay lead but it wasn't massive and it make me wonder where the 390x fit's in here, I've got another 6 benches to test but they not that important really for me the switch was a massive win thanks to the improvements between temps and noise.

Although not cheap I'm very happy with the Fury and I'm glad I got it to replace Hawaii.

Cracking temps those, my 290 at 1080 hits around 85/86 at 1440p, odd game hits 88, on auto fan, if i get temps like that on a Fury, be no bother with 2x. :p
 
Associate
Joined
25 Dec 2014
Posts
621
Location
Charlotte, NC
I just spent a few hours playing games with stock clocks, I spent time on the Bf4 campaign, Dying Light and Crysis 3 and real temp recorded a max of 53 degrees for the Sapphire Fury Tri-X. Earlier on a ten minute Furmark stress test with an 1100 overclock only reached 56 degrees. Plus it's silent, Coming from a 94 degree MSI 290x gaming I'm very happy.

A few comparison benches for the 290x Gaming and Fury Tri-x.

Gamename, 290x, Fury, min/avg/max

Fc2 115/156/240, 118/152/239,

Sleep Dog 37/52/63, 43/62/76,

Hitman Abs 46/57/182, 52/65/80,

Tomb Raider 64/87/114, 78/101/128,

Alien Iso 4/111/239, 5/127/180,

Res Evil 6 14307, 15876,

Apart from Far cry 2's bench where the 290x wins the Fury managed an okay lead but it wasn't massive and it make me wonder where the 390x fit's in here, I've got another 6 benches to test but they not that important really for me the switch was a massive win thanks to the improvements between temps and noise.

Although not cheap I'm very happy with the Fury and I'm glad I got it to replace Hawaii.

Thanks for those comparisons. If I wasn't watercooled I'd probably upgrade.
 
Permabanned
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Posts
9,221
Location
Knowhere
Running Fur marks stress test with no AA has it hitting 63 degrees and with the 1 for 1 fan profile I can hear the fans then, There not overly loud though, I'm going to adjust my fan profile and aim for a temp target of around 75 degrees max.
 
Associate
Joined
10 Jul 2009
Posts
1,559
Location
London
Running Fur marks stress test with no AA has it hitting 63 degrees and with the 1 for 1 fan profile I can hear the fans then, There not overly loud though, I'm going to adjust my fan profile and aim for a temp target of around 75 degrees max.

That is fantastic. Down in folding@home project we (internal beta testers) have been handed test work units which have some substrate or something which is very heavy on GPUs to simulate. It heats up every single gpu to the max. Even my Fury xs are getting to 64C on a hot day, and fans are quite loud, though I haven't played around with fan profiles on anything other than CCC.
 
Permabanned
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Posts
9,221
Location
Knowhere
I'm still interested to see your far cry 4 results btw since that's what you said was chugging on the 290x and I know the difference will be huge there :).

Far cry 4's running great, The 290x's performance was between 30 and 40 at 1080p while the Fury does the same settings between 70 and 80 at 1440p.

I'll actually get to play it now.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2010
Posts
4,967
Location
Aberdeenshire
Far cry 4's running great, The 290x's performance was between 30 and 40 at 1080p while the Fury does the same settings between 70 and 80 at 1440p.

I'll actually get to play it now.

Very nice :) great improvement!
I could run at 1080p with 100+ fps average and get the full use of my 144hz monitor but 1440p looks too good.

Also I'm determined to make use of this card since it cost me a bomb so I'll only be buying 1 game at a time and seeing it through til the end. I had an old habbit of buying too much games but never playing them.
 
Back
Top Bottom