I'm not disagreeing with the principle at all it is sound, but the effort should be earlier in the supply chain as I said earlier. Something does need to be done but this is a bit of a petty thing concentrate on IMO. Bigger picture this is a tiny piece of it.
How have we managed to get to 10 pages......it's 5p per bag!!!
A lot of them aren't bio degradable, even if they are bio degrable, they still take years, they clog up landfill, trap animals and is a huge waste of economic money. 5p doesn't sound a lot but it's dramatically cut usage in all countries it's been introduced in, as well as providing millions of £ for environmental schemes, the shops don't keep the 5p,
The I use it as a bin argument is Si flawed it's laughable, I do the same, but that's like 1 bag in 20. No one uses all off them as bins, or even close to.
That depends on the bag, and most last for way more than a few months. Why are you even attempting to argue it's a bad thing. It's impossible to argue that side.
A lot if the normal bags aren't biodegradable. So that's wrong to start with, the bags for life bags take less resources and energy to create than the equivalent disposable bags, bags for life, or at least Tesco ones are designed to last at least 10 times longer than disposable ones. And take far less than 10 disposable bags to make.
Each year Tesco alone gives out enough disposable bags to burry the uk 82 times over. Or the other stat I like if all Tesco disposable bags from one year were made into one giant bag, it would hold the moon twice, although you may need to double bag. It's a huge problem and this is a first step and will massively change culture, like it has in ever other country. We are reducing the issue, this isn't some scam, it's worked well and reduced waste in ever other country whos adopted it.
You really want green bags, use a rucksack or spend more than 10p and get the hessian type ones.
so what about the bags for life which last say 2-3 months.
are they biodegradeable or do they just stay forever in landfill?
A lot if the normal bags aren't biodegradable. So that's wrong to start with, the bags for life bags take less resources and energy to create than the equivalent disposable bags, bags for life, or at least Tesco ones are designed to last at least 10 times longer than disposable ones. And take far less than 10 disposable bags to make.
Each year Tesco alone gives out enough disposable bags to burry the uk 82 times over.
So far all you said was that it was provider of the bag issue rather than mine, as a consumer. They didn't provide me with biodegradable bag, so now I have to pay (for still non biodegradable bag). But anyway:
Tefal's point is still very valid. Instead of 20-30 bags that most of us would then use for rubbish liners etc let's say we all get bag for life. This bag for life will inevitably get filthy and ugly after 10 or 20 uses, so we chuck it away. At that point didn't we just replace 20 or 30 regular thin bags that will turn into atoms in 100 or 200 years, large percent of which were actually already quickly biodegradable with one thicker piece of plastic 'for life' that will never degrade or degrade in 1000 years? But we don't see it as much in a mix of landfill rubbish and thus feel much better for it?