Possible Sacking

Soldato
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
8,919
Location
Cayman Islands
A friend of mine took a week off sick a while back. On one of those days he was invited to an interview.

The following day he going into work and is questioned about his whereabouts. Apparently, his managers received news of the interview. And as a result have suspended my friend from work. Pending investigation.

Something doesn't seem right here. The only people who could've tipped his current employer off. We're those who interviewed him. Now of this is the case, what right do they have to be disclosing someone else's business?

Is this even legal?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Posts
15,943
Location
N. Ireland
I'm pretty sure employers are obliged to give employees time off for job interviews if they request it through the proper channels/procedure. was the sickie week just used to cover the interview up rather than a genuine sick week? - curious on what grounds they have suspended him?

but re the interviewers informing his current employer, you sure he didn't let slip to someone else that he had an interview, a friend at work perhaps. it's rather surprising how easily these things can get out. or maybe as roff has said they simply contacted his current employer for references
 
Associate
Joined
27 Aug 2015
Posts
77
Whilst it's pretty poor what's happened you can't say you're off sick and then go and go for an interview, probably doesn't look too great with potential new employer either if they find out.
Unless someones dropped a comment to management somewhere it will have most like come from the reference request as already mentioned
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2002
Posts
3,495
They can disclose whatever they want to disclose. If someone happens to see someone else in passing, and knows them, where they work and who they work for then that's not confidential information. In my "line of work" as it were, you tend to end up having a LOT of contacts across different companies in the same sector, so it may not even have come via references/HR.

He probably shouldn't have interviewed whilst claiming to be off sick. It's his own fault.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
21 Feb 2006
Posts
29,316
If he is fit enough to go to an interview he is fit enough to work. That I suspect is the starting point for this.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
The only people who could've tipped his current employer off. We're those who interviewed him. Now of this is the case, what right do they have to be disclosing someone else's business?

Is this even legal?

Why wouldn't it be? Maybe the hiring manager knows someone at the current employer and asked them discretely for an opinion of the guy and it got back to his current manager... Maybe the recruiter blabbed. Maybe someone who works there saw him in the building and told one of their friends at his current company.

Don't expect the fact you've applied to another firm to always remain confidential.

Last time I went for an interview I knew two of the rival candidates were current colleagues of mine because the recruiter asked a friend of mine at a completely different company(ex colleague) for his opinion of both me and the other candidates...

Likewise I've been called by a different friend about colleagues of mine who've applied to a job he's advertised - I'm not going to be a douche and go tell their current manager but I reckon some people might.

I currently know of quite a few people who've applied to different roles and they have no idea I know, that is simply from staying friends with former colleagues etc.. The typical MD will have an even bigger network and will hear far more gossip, not only that but some people below them might decide to share things they've heard... and recruiters (who are generally unethical) almost certainly will - it wouldn't be unheard of for a recruiter to let an MD know about members of their staff who are looking to move in return for hoping to be able to place people.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
2 Nov 2013
Posts
4,115
I reckon your friend needs to stop thinking how he might have been wronged, and start thinking about what he can do about what he did wrong himself.

Assuming he doesn't want to get sacked, I would suggest a quite contrite approach - state that he was genuinely feeling ill, but didn't think he would have the opportunity for the interview again, so dragged himself to it anyway. That it was a lapse of judgement, but he was not deliberately taking advantage of his current employer.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
11 Mar 2004
Posts
76,634
If he is fit enough to go to an interview he is fit enough to work. That I suspect is the starting point for this.

This isn't true, an interview is generally 30-90mins and a work shift more like 8hrs.
He dragged himself to the interview didn't he, but wasn't well enough to do a shift and self certified. That's probably how i'd play it. Well actually I would just get union to advise.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
21 Feb 2006
Posts
29,316
This isn't true, an interview is generally 30-90mins and a work shift more like 8hrs.
He dragged himself to the interview didn't he, but wasn't well enough to do a shift and self certified. That's probably how i'd play it. Well actually I would just get union to advise.

I've heard that many times so it sadly falls on deaf ears as in my experience that is rarely a real justification, it's just an excuse. If you are ill enough not to work there should be no interview either. I can bet 10000000 dollars if the company phoned up and asked him to attend for 1 hour to help them fix a problem that only he had the answer for, at the same time as his interview, he would be indignant at such a request due to his ill health.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,020
Have to agree with Glaucus - I dragged myself through the hour or so for my driving test while sick but there was no way I'd have been any use in my job at the time for an hour let alone do a full shift - fortunately I wasn't expected in work for a few days anyhow.

Does depend quite a lot on the nature of the job and sickness - I've dragged myself in for shifts in the office where I'm sitting down all day where I would have phoned in sick when doing more physically active stuff.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
3,510
Location
UK
If you've been employed more than 2 years it's quite hard to actually get sacked. I'm pretty sure a sob story about how he managed to drag himself to an interview that seemed too good to miss out on is sufficient to avoid a gross misconduct charge. Not sure I'd be confident at a tribunal whereby my only reason for sacking someone was their attending an interview while sick. Might have happened outside of work hours etc.

I'd be more worried about how his current employers will think if/when he doesn't get said job and has to pitch back up to work. Doesn't matter what the law says, human nature might see him overlooked or marginalized in some way.

Lesson to most people to take away from this is don't expect your private matters to remain secret when applying to jobs. I've had situations before where agencies let me know when my staff come across their radar for other roles and I can take subscriptions out to the CV databases to see who's updating their online presence, linkedin makes things like this easier as well and depending on the industry the world can be a small place and people talk. I don't particularly think any of that is ethical and try to avoid it but many employers are less scrupulous.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
8,919
Location
Cayman Islands
This isn't true, an interview is generally 30-90mins and a work shift more like 8hrs.
He dragged himself to the interview didn't he, but wasn't well enough to do a shift and self certified. That's probably how i'd play it. Well actually I would just get union to advise.

Well this is what I hope he said. I've not been able to speak to him yet.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 May 2009
Posts
21,257
Was he signed off for the week?
What was the reason for the illness?
You pull a shoulder muscle, and can't work, interview shouldn't matter.
Depends on the illness, but if he has given them cause to doubt his sickness, then thats a different matter.
 
Soldato
Joined
11 Feb 2010
Posts
2,756
Location
England
You sure this is your 'friend' and not you?

How long has your 'friend' worked for the company for? If it's more than 2 years if it's his first hiccup they will need to get him on gross misconduct; and when he's blatantly lied and breached the employers trust no matter where the source of info has came from then they could quite easily substantiate this.

If he's less than 2 years service he's stuffed.

You live and learn :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom