• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Rise of the Tomb Raider Bench Thread

Soldato
Joined
23 Dec 2013
Posts
3,527
Location
North Wales
Kaap might as well throw in the DX11 result, can't have thebennyboy sitting atop me:p

KPOKvU2.jpg

Same as before:

DX12
1080p
970@1380/3506(Stock clocks)
[email protected]
364.51 Drivers

Oh i don't think so. :D

GPU: R9 290X @ 1240/1600
CPU: 4790k @ 4.7GHz
Drivers: 16.3 Crimson

1080p - DX11
20160314201904_1.jpg

HBAO+ doing it's work making my 290X suffer. :p
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Dec 2013
Posts
3,527
Location
North Wales
Neither do I.:p

DX11
1080p
970@1535/3602
364.51 Drivers

wdLbkB3.jpg

Can't do any better than that, not bad for the old 290X. HBAO+ probably gives you the edge. I think i need to plug in the additional power connector as the card was pretty much drawing the max it could. :p

Got to a point where it was becoming unusually unstable no matter how much voltage i gave the core.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
27 Sep 2012
Posts
367
DX12
1440p
4790K @ 4.4
GTX 980
361.75 drivers

The old girl blew out some steam then haha! That last scene nearly erupted the whole PC :D

20160314231949_1.jpg
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Mar 2010
Posts
13,008
Location
Under The Stairs!
Your the lucky one if your running Nvidia now :)

On a serious note I am actually unimpressed so far with the dx12 numbers.

Don't know about how it's running on AMD, but unless G-Sync isn't enabled in the DX12 build, then DX11 is running way better than DX12 here, Mantle for me had a much bigger impact, it really didn't get the credit it deserved imho but that's the nature of the game.:)

:cool:
As am I. Is there any reason to buy this game before Volta? :/

If you enjoyed the first one and didn't get bored and want more of the same, that's reason enough to get it, but it is just more of the same imo.

Can't do any better than that, not bad for the old 290X. HBAO+ probably gives you the edge. I think i need to plug in the additional power connector as the card was pretty much drawing the max it could. :p

Got to a point where it was becoming unusually unstable no matter how much voltage i gave the core.

First time Iv'e pushed this 970, don't oc any more and just run stock now, that Kaap character dragged me back in, used to have the 290X, it's built like a tank, cracking card in it's own right as is the 970.

Never know mate if AMD can, they'll get some more out of this.:)

:cool:
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Feb 2006
Posts
3,195
Oh i don't think so. :D

GPU: R9 290X @ 1240/1600
CPU: 4790k @ 4.7GHz
Drivers: 16.3 Crimson

1080p - DX11
20160314201904_1.jpg

HBAO+ doing it's work making my 290X suffer. :p

The 290X is being limited by a driver problem othus affecting the result. Since it's a very high texture quality setting I suspect some memory management issue which the 970 avoids due to the game being Nvidia sponsored. It's only the AMD cards which appear to act according to the developer warning that the setting needs more than 4GB.

Rather strange imo if the 4GB Nvidia cards don't seem to be affected by the >4GB requirement. Foul play or just a coincidence? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom