Poll: Trident - would you renew? (Poll)

Would you renew Trident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 701 73.7%
  • No

    Votes: 250 26.3%

  • Total voters
    951
Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
How would you vote in relation to the potential replacement of the trident nuclear weapons system?

I'd vote not to replace them - too expensive / money could have a more realisable effect elsewhere. Also, can't we just keep using / maintaining the existing ones? Not sure on that.

I expect a huge vote to renew!
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Feb 2007
Posts
14,118
Location
South Shields
While I don't see a need for them in this day and age, i do not believe the world is stable enough to dispense with them entirely.
Plus, when Merkel said 'we can't be Switzerland with nukes' I say tough titties , watch us. Just jealous because they are not allowed them :D
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 May 2007
Posts
39,700
Location
Surrey
Renew

We obviously don't want to be part of any sort of union or globalisation so we better at least have some nukes to stop things going **** up.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Mar 2006
Posts
2,537
Location
Birmingham, UK
I have a question. When people say its a waste of money what exactly happens to the money? Does it stay in the UK economy or does it go abroad somewhere never to be seen again?
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Jun 2004
Posts
26,684
Location
Deep England
I wish they'd rather spend that money on the bits of the armed forces that are actually doing the fighting, and even if the UK was nuked by a hostile foreign force would we fire it? I'm not so sure at the moment. Then again though, Trident is the best deterrent available to us, so having it does provide some reassurance in these difficult times. I just can't help feeling that we're putting all our eggs in one basket.

I see Comrade Corbyn is backing away from his Labour manifesto pledge to support the renewal of Trident.
 
Man of Honour
OP
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
I have a question. When people say its a waste of money what exactly happens to the money? Does it stay in the UK economy or does it go abroad somewhere never to be seen again?

No doubt there would be jobs in the renewal, but it's more that the end product is 'less practicable' (to say the least) than if the same money were spent on the NHS, infrastructure.... Anything really.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
Renew of course. Trident isn't a weapon you fire, it's a weapon to stop you being fired upon. This is what people don't understand.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Nov 2010
Posts
23,953
Location
Hertfordshire
Problem is, none of us are clued up on what the best option is. This is why we have people out there, some that are voted, to make said decisions for us.

However, I'd like to think that no nation,that has such weapons, would ever use them again. So i would like to see them gone, or at least heavily reduced a long with a lot of other military spends.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
11 May 2007
Posts
8,917
Location
Surrey
In this day and age, no one should need nuclear arms. It would be more sensible to spend the money in convincing everyone to get along and get rid of nuclear attack capabilities.

That said, the entire world seems to be going backwards...
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Apr 2007
Posts
11,836
No doubt there would be jobs in the renewal, but it's more that the end product is 'less practicable' (to say the least) than if the same money were spent on the NHS, infrastructure.... Anything really.

I thought trident came out ofvthe military budget, which is ringfenced at 2% of gdp. Might be wrong though, but if that's the case I say renew, especially if we are going to be independent.
 
Back
Top Bottom