Brexit thread - what happens next

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
7 Nov 2002
Posts
7,501
Location
pantyhose factory
Are there any legal implications to excluding the UK from bids? We are still fully paid up members at this time and have yet to officially announce our departure.

no actual legal recourse as they can choose who to include based on merit/ skill etc and could easily prove that the selection they made was appropriate for the project being comissioned. So unless there is a clear cut case that a UK scientist is being prejudiced against purely for being from the UK (yeah good luck proving that one in court), then there is no recourse.
 
Caporegime
Joined
19 May 2004
Posts
31,484
Location
Nordfriesland, Germany
Are there any legal implications to excluding the UK from bids? We are still fully paid up members at this time and have yet to officially announce our departure.

No, because it's not the UK being excluded from the bids; it's individual UK scientists. Collaborations are not a case of equal opportunities anything; they're a case of a group of scientists deciding to apply for funding together. As such they're subject to as much petty politics as anyone likes.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,747
He is pro communist isnt he. I watched that video yesterday and almost posted it here also because he seemed quite aligned to what I think, the EU is severely challenged and UK leaving may be of not much note in history retrospectively because of that

Its not about being a note in history, it's about sticking several sharp objects into Junkers...
ideology
.
 
Associate
Associate
Joined
26 Jun 2016
Posts
293
By the sounds of it some of the UK scientists are now finding that they aren't being allowed to join consortium to bid for funding from the EU (we pay in about 5 billion for R&D and get back about 8-9 billion), as the other scientists in the consortium are worried about the fact that these are multi year projects where the participants might be doing work in different countries.

Basically without knowing if the various people will be able to do the necessary exchanges/work in each others countries they don't want UK scientists involved as it could cause massive problems.

An outcome that I don't think comes as much of a surprise to those who had any clue about long term multi year projects that involved workers from multiple countries.



But does that offset the extra we're going to be paying for all imports?

if you cant afford brands then import prices will drop, infact if we abandon tax on items it could be cheaper, remember import duty tax raises the price of goods for the consumer, so people look for substitutes.
 
Associate
Joined
21 Jul 2012
Posts
680
We should have two threads - One that focuses on the potential benefits and positive aspects of BREXIT, and one for the bitter 'democratic-when-it-suits-them' losers who voted to remain. ;)

The hand-wringing that is going on in here is hilarious. Keep it up! :D
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
We should have two threads - One that focuses on the potential benefits and positive aspects of BREXIT, and one for the bitter 'democratic-when-it-suits-them' losers who voted to remain. ;)

The hand-wringing that is going on in here is hilarious. Keep it up! :D

If they were pro-democracy then they wouldn't be supporting the EU in the first place.
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Dec 2009
Posts
10,570
How many million 'remainers' voted to ignore the result again? 4 million?

Imagine that - 4 million remainers supporting a petition created by a leave voter and indeed Nigel Farrage's position that a 52/48 result would not be the end.

That'd be a pretty small thread at this point :p

You could just fill it with Daily Express headlines. What do we have today?

"No U-Turn on Border Controls"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom