Z370, SLI and NVMe drives

Associate
Joined
29 Dec 2015
Posts
102
Location
UK
For context - So i'm making upgrades to my PC (6700k --> 8700k) and obviously will need a new motherboard (waiting on Maximus X Formula), also plan to SLI my GPU as well add adding in an m.2 SSD for my boot drive.

Now with the amount of PCIe lanes the 8700k on Z370 has, will there be any limitations having dual SLI and an m.2 NVMe drive installed simultaneously, or more to the point, will the SSD be limited by anything at all?

I only have this question since I want to experience the full shabang when it comes to m.2 drives as a boot drive.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Posts
18,514
You should be fine, most run the second m.2 of the bottom full length PCIe x4 .
Not sure with triple m.2 with the z379 boards if they eat into any data ports or pull from any of the x1 PCIe slots or GPU slots.
Having a look at hero manically should give you an indication
 
Associate
OP
Joined
29 Dec 2015
Posts
102
Location
UK
You should be fine, most run the second m.2 of the bottom full length PCIe x4 .
Not sure with triple m.2 with the z379 boards if they eat into any data ports or pull from any of the x1 PCIe slots or GPU slots.
Having a look at hero manically should give you an indication

Alright, thanks for the confirmation! I only plan on using one m.2 as a boot drive and mass storage on Sata SSD's
 
Associate
OP
Joined
29 Dec 2015
Posts
102
Location
UK
No the M.2 NVME wont use or impact any of the lanes your GPU's will use, it will just disable some of the SATA ports on your board (normally).

Oh I didn't realise that was normal, alright then! Gonna look online to see if there's any manuals out for the MXF, see which exact ports will be disabled.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
29 Dec 2015
Posts
102
Location
UK
Yes. The Samsung 960 EVO will boot windows about the same as a regular SATA i.e 850 EVO. It will come into it's own (960 EVO) when working with large files, or maybe running heavily modded games etc.

Oh well that's a bit of a bummer, s'pose I should have done some research on that prior. My current boot drive is a 850 Pro and mass storage is on a WD Black HDD. I don't really do a lot of large file transfers so that's kinda set me back on it actually. Glad you said it though
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2005
Posts
10,927
Location
manchester,uk
Oh well that's a bit of a bummer, s'pose I should have done some research on that prior. My current boot drive is a 850 Pro and mass storage is on a WD Black HDD. I don't really do a lot of large file transfers so that's kinda set me back on it actually. Glad you said it though

This review which shows Win 8.1 boot times gives you some idea. As you can see there is not much difference between a 960 EVO and the slowest SATA SSD.

http://techreport.com/review/30993/samsung-960-evo-ssd-reviewed/5

I would just go with something like a Crucial MX300.
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Posts
18,514
no idea why people go on about boot time haha, if your PC takes 2 mins then go make a cup of tea - its all the processes in the back end and applications installed on it that I like :D
but guess people use their systems for different things
 
Associate
OP
Joined
29 Dec 2015
Posts
102
Location
UK
no idea why people go on about boot time haha, if your PC takes 2 mins then go make a cup of tea - its all the processes in the back end and applications installed on it that I like :D
but guess people use their systems for different things

Hot drinks aren't for everybody :p I get that people are more accustomed to waiting a moment but in my use case, the faster I can load up Destiny 2 (as of tomorrow), the better!
 
Back
Top Bottom