Fair one if it is him. I did try to calm him down but he wasn't.
Think your right - seemed to be using term "naysayer" quite a bit which rings some bells
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Fair one if it is him. I did try to calm him down but he wasn't.
I expected in the worst case scenario the 2080 to perform 5% better than a AIB 1080 Ti. Somehow it has managed to be worse with the 2080 (Being overclocked by default) on par or worse than a 1080 Ti FE (Non overclocked).
by the time games use this rt and dlss your card will be old .. major uptake if it happens will be gen 2-3 after the playstation / xbox take it on ..
so atm and prob for the next 3-4 yrs it's worthless
2 months is old? About 20 major title's will have it when the Windows update drops.
Say the 1080 Ti is £650 and 2080 Ti is on average £1,100. The performance increase is 30% on average, and the extra cost is £450.
Firstly, how much would you pay for extra 30% performance? It wouldn't quite be 30% extra cost i.e. 1 for 1, because you expect improvement over time, but technology is improving more slowly here, so let's say 20% more is fair. Thats £120 extra cost for that performance, but let's round up to £150.
That leaves £300 of the extra cost which we must attribute to RT and DLSS capability, which has the potential for future deployment at varying degrees of success. So the question is, do you value to the tune of £300 the potential to benefit from these features in the future?
Let's isolate this and look at it another way. If it's £300 for RT and DLSS that you pay, would you spend that money on a standalone dedicated RT/DLSS card (a modern PhyX card if you will) to sit alongside your current 1080 Ti? Does that make sense for what it will bring to your gaming experience?
2080 performances is around the same and in some games worst then 1080 ti but it is £100 more expensive. Definitely no reason to get 2080 over 1080ti.
2080ti is around 15 to 30% faster then 1080ti but its 80% more expensive !
Linus tech tips had developer of game with RTX tech in it lined up to provide a beta preview which then mysteriously gets cancelled?
Methinks Linus is right when he says Nvidia are selling cards, by their very name, with a feature that isn't ready and I personally suspect one that won't ever provide a particularly acceptable experience in the `2000` series hardware.
Did you rip that graphic off the Nvidia site because those increases are not even close to what reviewers saw and not in a good way
No it is from HardwareCanucks video review benchmarks. They are accurate figures. Other reviews also confirm similar findings so no need to call Mulder & Scully