Can we start moving dull politics into speakers' corner?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posts
4,387
Location
Baa
Creationists think they've won the argument because the other side is sick of dealing with them.

What kind of double-digit IQ must you have for that point to have gone over your head?

You can't say you're sick of dealing with someone just because you have no argument. If you believe in Brexit then argue for it. Tell folk why it's so great. Sell it to them. Skulking off and creating troll threads instead is a bit crap.

Are you able to communicate without throwing childish insults around?
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jun 2005
Posts
7,586
You can't say you're sick of dealing with someone just because you have no argument. Tell folk why it's so great. Sell it to them.
Creationists are emotionally invested, irrational, dishonest, and suffer from rampant, uncontrollable confirmation bias. No amount of evidence to the contrary of their preconceived ideas will make any difference, hence people get sick of dealing wit them.

Again, another incredibly simple point that is beyond you.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posts
4,387
Location
Baa
Creationists are emotionally invested, irrational, dishonest, and suffer from rampant, uncontrollable confirmation bias. No amount of evidence to the contrary of their preconceived ideas will make any difference, hence people get sick of dealing wit them.

Again, another incredibly simple point that is beyond you.

Skunky pal, we can't go on like this. You know clever folk don't throw insults around so readily, right?

Anyway, what you describe sounds exactly like the Brexit cult.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
Speakers Corner is full of hardcore never Trumpers and sore loser remainers needing a safe space from the "deplorable"/"low information" population of GD so no and it's worse than social media in terms of censorship.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
GD used to be fun, light hearted, a bit of a laugh. Now every other thread is dreary politics with news links and people being cross.

I do wonder if there should be a third discussion forum:


SC for the serious discussions

GD for general stuff... including discussions of news stories etc.. that aren't really serious enough for SC

and why not: LC - Low content - for, well, low content threads...

people who just want to read jokey/banal stuff without having to come across any threads concerning news events or politics etc.. can then avoid it completely



Eh? Why should a thread like that be put in SC?

Ostensibly SC is for serious discussions, granted two of the main threads also have a lot of low content posts from people who just want to vent about Trump/Brexit -. post an article and/or short comment etc...

topics like the above are not really serious and general discussion is for anything general - frankly if people don't want to read a thread about SJWs then no one is forcing them to, ironically some of the people who complain about such threads post more than once in them and take part in arguing with the opinions of others about the subject matter

The outrage over the "outrage" is so amusing though.

and the outrage over the outrage over the outrage.... like people moaning about threads about SJWs moaning - it sort of becomes a bit recursive
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Posts
12,236
Location
UK
ironically some of the people who complain about such threads post more than once in them and take part in arguing with the opinions of others about the subject matter
Because some crazy opinions are seemingly taking over everything and it'll only stop if someone does something about it. Doing nothing just doesn't seem like an option anymore.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
Because some crazy opinions are seemingly taking over everything and it'll only stop if someone does something about it. Doing nothing just doesn't seem like an option anymore.

That's seems to be the motivation at each level though... thus you get the recursive moaning

if it really bothers you then perhaps just ignore those threads and read another thread - or try starting more of the sort of threads you want to see

after all everyone is able to create a thread and if people aren't interested in a thread it drops off the first page - so if you don't like/aren't interested in a thread then don't reply to it and it will drop down the list quicker, if you want more of a particular type of thread then start creating your own and see if people choose to reply or not....

if you're actively replying to threads you don't really have much interest in or want to see less of then it is somewhat self defeating as you prolong the time the thread is near the top of the list for and increase the chances of yet more posters replying
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Apr 2007
Posts
6,590
GD is now full of SJW, feminist, racist, and global politics rants. Shouldn't these be in speakers' corner if they have a serious point to make?

GD used to be fun, light hearted, a bit of a laugh. Now every other thread is dreary politics with news links and people being cross.

I've done this myself but will now endeavour to put these threads in SC. Who's with me? You're either with me or you're against me.

No.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Feb 2004
Posts
14,309
Location
Peoples Republic of Histonia, Cambridge
Magnolia, do you realise that (in GD at least) 99% of your posts are condescending put-downs. If you truly don't believe you're some kind of intelligentsia you might want to work on a more constructive posting style. If I cared to I could find hundreds of threads where you've just popped in to insult someone and left no other comment.

Must resist moving this thread to SC

Please. Then maybe he'll find Magnolia's replies less condescending.

So what you are saying is you want a safe space.....

Pretty much. They can Trump it up in blissful ignorance.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
Ignoring it doesn't work. They don't stop. Someone has to stop them.

which indicates that plenty of people are happy to discuss the topics...

no one is forcing you to read through threads you're not interested in, if no one is interested in a thread then it drops down the list... you're free to make your own threads too, though if people aren't interested in your threads then they too will drop down the list - you can't dictate what threads people should or should't be interested in
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Aug 2007
Posts
28,597
Location
Auckland
and why not: LC - Low content - for, well, low content threads...

people who just want to read jokey/banal stuff without having to come across any threads concerning news events or politics etc.. can then avoid it completely
Low content, low effort posting is Reddit territory. I'm not sure that's a place we want to visit although kudos for thinking of different ways of approaching the problem. Um, that was sincere for new players / Foxeye :)
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
29,950
Location
Norrbotten, Sweden.
Well I love reading your guys pretend to be pseudo intellectual and basically put down each other, within the ruleset of the forum.

Which has become progressively ruled by a more iron fist of un-tolorance.

It helps me keep up with the UK news and remind me of all the crap I left behind or few things I still miss, boohoo Paxo stuffing, boohoo.

I say keep it how it is or even get rid of SC. Let all the nonsense fill one space. Allow people to self moderate, if they don't like it don't read it.

Post more fun stuff, then watch it get removed for banality. Too many subsections make jack a dull forum.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Posts
17,504
Location
Gloucestershire
Light hearted stuff gets pushed to the specialist forums, so what's left for GD?

Even a lot of 'how to life' is covered by the careers bit now.

And, I've mentioned this before, when you can post a fully-GD thread about a chap getting a boner at a naked cycle ride and it gets moved to die in the weirdo bicycle forum, then it's a bit demotivating to put the effort in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom