Dead X99 System - What do I replace it with?

Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
See here in the pic -

X99Pins_zps19urhi84.png
 
Associate
Joined
10 Jan 2006
Posts
1,332
Location
Scotland
Think there's been threads in the past where somehow pins have become bent when CPUs are extracted (cleanly). Don't think there's ever been a reason figured out for it.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Think there's been threads in the past where somehow pins have become bent when CPUs are extracted (cleanly). Don't think there's ever been a reason figured out for it.

Thanks, anything you can show me to reference this and send across to the support team? The mobo might still be dead, no related to the pins. I just dont want the pins to be the focus point (unless that is all it is).
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Ok, I bought an electronic microscope and was able to get the pins back to where they needed to be. Its tedious to do but it looked good.

It then gave error 68 again and sometimes 33 but then 68 from there onwards.

Will assume therefore the mobo (unless the CPU is the problem) is borked. RMA time.
 
Associate
Joined
10 Jan 2006
Posts
1,332
Location
Scotland
Thanks, anything you can show me to reference this and send across to the support team? The mobo might still be dead, no related to the pins. I just dont want the pins to be the focus point (unless that is all it is).

Sorry completely forgot you had asked this...

Typically I can't remember what thread it was, just recall finding it a bit odd at the time, pretty sure it was a thread from last year.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Board has gone back, now we wait.

Ive noticed that this machine always takes ages to boot, is that normal? The older i7 setup Im using as a temp machine boots in like 20-30 secs. The X99 takes 2 mins easily, takes ages to post etc. Could that have been a problem or is this normal?
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Ok, Overclockers have responded with 'no fault found'. This suggests the CPU is borked, correct? How else could I rule out the RAM as it doesnt boot beyond the BIOS code for missing RAM (I dont have spare sticks to test with).
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Posts
8,393
Ok, Overclockers have responded with 'no fault found'. This suggests the CPU is borked, correct? How else could I rule out the RAM as it doesnt boot beyond the BIOS code for missing RAM (I dont have spare sticks to test with).

Purchase second-hand sticks (at least two sticks in case one is dodgy), test, then sell on for same price you bought them, or keep if that does the trick.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Purchase second-hand sticks (at least two sticks in case one is dodgy), test, then sell on for same price you bought them, or keep if that does the trick.

Thanks, will shop around or see if anyone at work might have some. Any idea on the chance of this being faulty ram and causing this 68 message? They dont sound related at all.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Posts
8,393
Thanks, will shop around or see if anyone at work might have some. Any idea on the chance of this being faulty ram and causing this 68 message? They dont sound related at all.

No idea. RAM can do weird things though. Maybe wait for board to come back and re-test with same components before buying anything. You can test one stick of RAM at a time, and Memtest (HCI). See if any clue pops up.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Posts
228
Back
Top Bottom