Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Turing haters will be eating their hats tonight.
Turing has outsold pascal to on the same timeline.
LOL, got people into an excited frenzy . I feel scammed now. @crinkleshoes can breathe a sigh of relief - no new "super" GPU.
The Turing haters will be eating their hats tonight.
Turing has outsold pascal to on the same timeline.
Is it just me or does Studio Lightspeed sound like utter desperation? Very little uptake by studios to add ray tracing to their current and future titles, so Nvidia bodge and patch old games with RT to validate its existence?
And unless Quake 2 gets a geometry update too, it's hardly a satisfying selling point for RTX.
There is over 100 RTX rayvtracing games in development - released news at Computex
Not woken up fully at this point so I missed that. So then if there are over (finally) 100 RTX games in development, and ray tracing is the future, why go back and remaster old titles? Still seems utterly desperate. But then again, it depends on the titles they're remastering.There is over 100 RTX rayvtracing games in development - released news at Computex
No way
How many 2070, 2060 or RTX Titan owners do you see on this forum.
Wonder why NVidia are doing so badly with their financial results and share price.
Turing is the worst product NVidia has launched in years, it is overpriced with features most end users don't think are value for money.
Even the Titan V is better value for money, at least it can do DP professional work as well as gaming.
There is over 100 RTX rayvtracing games in development - released news at Computex
How many games are available now that can make maximum use of all the RTX features?
None
Or as Monty Python would say, nearly 1.
RTX is so gimped to get it running on existing hardware that the results and performance are extremely disappointing.
Doing if for free mind, at least in the case of Quake 2.Not woken up fully at this point so I missed that. So then if there are over (finally) 100 RTX games in development, and ray tracing is the future, why go back and remaster old titles? Still seems utterly desperate. But then again, it depends on the titles they're remastering.
Rtx for a 20 year old game, what every person wanted a £1000-1600 card for.