Caporegime
That video you linked is pathetic aimed at fanboys who lap up any old biased crap.
He complained that Intel tested with both systems using stock RAM speeds.
How could Intel even test a Ryzen laptop chip at 3,733 RAM!
Does that imply that the Intel system should be handicapped to 2,400 because that's the best AMD offer?
In which case when he tests Zen 2 against an i7-8700 he should use DDR4-2667 for both systems as otherwise to quote him, "are we testing RAM speed or the CPU".
Apart from the blatantly biased nature of the content, what a weird and creepy voice he has.
Its in the same vain that AMD clock their current GPU's about as high as they can go so they somewhat keep up with nVidia, in the same way AMD also did that to the FX-9590, so it could keep up with a 3770K.
That is and was pathetic.
Here Intel are introducing a brand new platform on their 10nm node, and it can't keep up with AMD's older architecture without running the memory at close to 4Ghz, the Ryzen 3700u is the same as the three year old 14nm First Gen Vega iGPU's refreshed on 12nm.
Ice Lake was supposed to be Intel's new wunderkind.
No wonder Intel's top brass looked like this at Computex, They don't have any answers to what AMD are doing these days.
PS: you'd need to be pretty desperate to hire Ryan Shrout for PR. Its a bit like the Tories hiring Alastair Campbell