GPs complaints regarding work life balance

Soldato
Joined
29 May 2006
Posts
5,351
“And through the so called "holidays" (actually called non contact time).”
That is incorrect. Non-contact time are lessons during the work day where they do not teach so they can do the paperwork at work instead of in the holidays. Teacher normally have a number of non-contact time lessons in the timetable every week. Its not always enough to get everything done but the point of non contact time is so they don't work in the holidays.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 May 2006
Posts
5,351
Teachers really do have a lack of perspective since the vast majority have never done anything else. Yes there is a serious amount of planning....once. Then the remaining 40 years of your life are the same year stuck on repeat.
I can't see the likeness from a GP (responsible for people's lives) to someone with a social sciences degree teaching 6 year old children their 2x tables.
While I fully agree about the lack of perspective as there is a massive difference a lot of the time between a Teacher that's never had another job and someone who went into Teaching at a later date. In a Good or better school they cannot just do planning once and remain on repeat.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2004
Posts
7,051
Nurses and teachers also have to undergo training.
Degree, school experience, PGCE, NQT then qualify. 6 years...

Some nurses do similar length training.

Your argument is moot.

Doesn't matter what your paid, shouldn't have to do silly hours. But, comparatively should they not be expected too based off the salary they demand?
Teacher can be done in a 3 year course, GP takes 9 years.

Not berating teachers at all, they are grossly undervalued in society. But it's not the same at all.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,388
Location
Birmingham
@Buddy - Great post, thank you for taking the time to write it. Being a good GP is incredibly challenging and there aren’t enough GPs. I certainly couldn’t do it!

There appears to be a slow poisoning of the health service lead by underfunding and media slurs. If the people perceive the NHS to be failing, the slow creep of privatisation will be welcomed. This is a terribly dangerous situation for the general public who haven’t ever needed to save a penny to pay for health insurance. At age 60 with high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes you would have very limited options when taking out a new policy. And yet this is the sort of person who would be required to work for another 8 years to support themselves and their family and presumably remain in good health to do so.

Owning a business (like being a GP) is hard work and doesn’t just involve the interactions with clients. The behind the scenes work is crazy for GPs, not just with patient admin but also trying to keep afloat with diminishing tariffs from CCGs. Oh and there’s actually keeping up to date with the ever advancing field of medicine... which as far as I can tell a GP needs to know pretty much everything about.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Nov 2006
Posts
23,363
Teacher can be done in a 3 year course, GP takes 9 years.

Not berating teachers at all, they are grossly undervalued in society. But it's not the same at all.

Yep it's a totally different issue there.

Teaching is just an unattractive career for most people. Especially people with skills in STEM subjects.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,388
Location
Birmingham
They know what they are getting into when they sign up to being a gp

If it's so bad get another job .

I would argue that it’s almost impossible to know what you’re getting into when a prospective GP starts tailoring A levels and work experience at the age of 16. They won’t get to the sharp end for another 15 years... nearly as long as they’ve been alive! The huge shifts in GP funding alone make it impossible to keep up with, let along the advances in medical practice and the changes in working practice.
 

Deleted member 66701

D

Deleted member 66701

Does this level of earning not come with the expectation of long hours and lack of a good work life balance?

I don't think any salary should affect having a good work life balance.

Doctors salary should reflect thier training and responsibility, not hours worked.
 
Associate
Joined
1 Jul 2009
Posts
728
Location
Shropshire/Paris
I'd rather go to a doctor that works 9-5 and is not exhausted.

I don't care he/she is paid £100k. They are paid that for their intellect and the responsibility they have (plus 9 years training).

Air traffic controllers earn silly money but they are not allowed to work long hours otherwise people will die.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
3 Jun 2012
Posts
10,824
Teacher can be done in a 3 year course, GP takes 9 years.

Not berating teachers at all, they are grossly undervalued in society. But it's not the same at all.
You cannot become a teacher in 3 years.
Two years alone is the teacher training, which you need a degree to access.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
3 Jun 2012
Posts
10,824
That is incorrect. Non-contact time are lessons during the work day where they do not teach so they can do the paperwork at work instead of in the holidays. Teacher normally have a number of non-contact time lessons in the timetable every week. Its not always enough to get everything done but the point of non contact time is so they don't work in the holidays.
You are incorrect.

The lessons you refer to are PPA. Which there is 5 of a fortnight.

Not enough time to plan, mark and prepare for the other 45 lessons.

For example, year groups reports may take 6 hours to deal with. And there is 7 year groups in secondary education.

The "holidays" are intact non contact time. Apart from 30odd days which every single person is entitled too as holiday.
Teachers are expected to work during the "holidays".

Anyone who says different needs to reassess their understanding.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
3 Jun 2012
Posts
10,824
I agree.
Teachers really do have a lack of perspective since the vast majority have never done anything else. Yes there is a serious amount of planning....once. Then the remaining 40 years of your life are the same year stuck on repeat.


Once?

Why make a comment when you are ignorant to how things actually work
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
Don't you need good grades from very young? i.e. As in GCSE and As in A-Level in order to apply to do a degree in medicine. It's not like you got a chance to rock up to university to do medicine with 3 Cs in A-levels with 7 Bs in GCSEs. So it's not just a longer degree than normal but having worked hard at school from a very young age to get a chance to even get your foot through the door to do the degree in the first place.

Whilst I don't have anything to support that most people can't be a doctor, but I don't believe that most people got what it takes to be a doctor.

(You are probably going to reply with the percentages of As in A-Level results being a lot but how many are those are in Chemistry, Mathematics, as opposed to Media Studies?)

The lady I've mentioned has 5 GCSE's and no A-levels, she failed them. She started a course at college when she was 25 (think it was 3 years, I may be wrong) which then allowed her to apply for and get on to a medical degree. When I applied for St Andrews they were wanting ABB from memory although I don't think they took less than an AAB. GCSE's didn't come in to it. At least for me as they never asked to see my results.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
15,991
Location
North West
Hey

Heard something on the radio today which annoyed me a little. Enough to write a most likely pointless thread about it.

GPs are complaining about working hours and their subsequent work life balance.

What irked me somewhat was the fact that these professionals earn a substantial amount of money. On average a GP earns £90,000 according to internet statistics.

Does this level of earning not come with the expectation of long hours and lack of a good work life balance?

The chap on the radio said he starts work at 7:30, and sometimes doesn't stop till 6:30 due to paperwork.
He sounded like this was just unacceptable.

But wait... Teachers for example can start work at similar hours and carry on working well into the evening. Weekends too. And through the so called "holidays" (actually called non contact time).
Yet teachers are paid on average £30,000. (This figure ignores the inflated wage of Senior leadership positions.. people who don't really teach much)

Nurses can do shifts that rival GPs, yet on average get paid £23,000.

So... Why are GPs up in arms about this? If they were getting paid a comparative figure to other public sector workers I would understand. But they don't, they earn substantially more.

Hmmmm. Posh guys expecting to have their cake and eat it too?

Being paid lots does not mean you suddenly become super human. Just as nurses and police shouldn’t be subject to extensive hours.

Good posts by Buddy and tom_nieto.

Think we need to focus on the overall issue spanning jobs/roles and mental health/exhaustion/quality of life etc etc.

Nurses shouldn’t be doing the shifts they do, doctors shouldn’t, police men shouldn’t.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2004
Posts
7,051
Thats a degree. They still have to carry out the PGCE on the job and then do their NQT. So it's 5 years

Oh also, that's primary. And a very specialised course. Would lock you into primary teaching.
The course has PGTE included. You can also do a secondary level one.

3 years to become a teacher, being a specialised course or not is irrelevant, if you wanted to become a teacher it takes 3 years.
 

SPG

SPG

Soldato
Joined
28 Jul 2010
Posts
10,255
Who said it was easy?????

I wouldn't dream of training to be a doctor. That requires remembering lots of things all the time, what a ball ache.

It was a reply to the length of time it takes to train.. I just pointed out it's similar as other professions.

No it doesn't, they pop out to consult with colleagues all the time, people have been fixing people since well people existed, yes it requires training and its one of those jobs where you start with 10% and gain experience very quickly but making it out as if its some dark necromancy helps no one apart from the GP own pay packet (another Labour **** up)

But to the issue at hand this is clearly everyone who works excess hrs without getting paid for them, sure you get a deadline now and then and you do not mind staying over. But it is not to be expected just another tool the masters in charge to demand it the norm when it is not. Either employ more people or improve effiency within the allocated time available or by law everyone clocks/in and out and you get paid overtime. That will soon drive efficiency when it hits the bottom line of the masters.
 
Back
Top Bottom