The Sony A73/A7R3/A7S3/A9 Thread

Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
Weird question :p. What did you lot do with your first camera when you bought your second? Keep it for old times sake or sell it to help with the upgrade.
People generally either sell it to recoup costs or keep it as a backup. Pretty self-explanatory I would have thought.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,677
Location
Co Durham
LOL I know it's one of two! More just inquisitive as to what people did, for those that kept the camera e.g. do they go back to it?

SSince it was a totally complete different system (olympus) and I had quite a few lenses I sold the lots for £5,400 to fund the Sony A7iii and a few lenses to start me off. I couldn't have afforded to have kept both.

If it had been an earlier sony e mount body I may have kept it as a backup though.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2004
Posts
7,051
Im having a huge dilema at the moment, Do I keep my Canon lenses or just sell the lot in favour of moving to Sony, or do I just hope Canon can release a good Mirrorless with IBS sooner rather than later.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Apr 2007
Posts
13,535
Anyone have the Samyang 50 f1.4 AF? I want something for nighttime street shots, the 55 is starting to be a bit expensive for how often i would use it.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
4,278
The 200-600G will be posing the bigger problem for me in relation to my existing 100-400GM. The purchase of the 600 F4 or 400 F2.8 is in the same league as what Ferrari should I buy next.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,677
Location
Co Durham
Waiting for the reviews on the 200-600. The fact that the TC works with it makes me want it even though I have the 100-400. If there isnt a noticeable drop in sharpness I think I will have to get it just for the extra reach.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
The 200-600G will be posing the bigger problem for me in relation to my existing 100-400GM. The purchase of the 600 F4 or 400 F2.8 is in the same league as what Ferrari should I buy next.
Unless I had a VERY specific reason I would rather carry around a 100-400 + 1.4xTC than a 100-400 AND a 200-600 in my bag. Especially with my Sony a7R3 where the sensor gives you extra reach through the additional MP cropping ability.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
4,278
I'd be swapping the 100-400 for the 200-600, couldn't see the point of having both since it's the reach I'm interested in. I'd have to weigh up whether a gain of 2/3 of a stop and 40mm (with the 1.4 TC on the 100-400 @ F8 ) is worth it for changing a GM lens for a G and losing the portability of the 100-400.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
74,171
Location
Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
I'd be swapping the 100-400 for the 200-600, couldn't see the point of having both since it's the reach I'm interested in. I'd have to weigh up whether a gain of 2/3 of a stop and 40mm (with the 1.4 TC on the 100-400 @ F8 ) is worth it for changing a GM lens for a G and losing the portability of the 100-400.

Is the F-stop between the 2 lens the same in their respective focal length?
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,421
Location
Utopia
Looking at this photo of all lenses and sizes...

size-1.jpg

I really would also prefer to buy a 400mm f2.8 than the 600mm f4, especially with a high resolution sensor. The sizes of the 200-600 and the 600mm are pretty damn prohibitive, massive even, and with the additional cropping power of 40+MP I think the 400mm's would be fine for the majority of applications as far as amateurs are concerned.
 
Back
Top Bottom