• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Something super is coming...

Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
I guess it depends when the day was. In 1994 $3-4K was the value segment for those that couldn’t afford Pentium and SCSI.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-Qil3sD8bgEC&lpg=PA7&dq=Pc magazine 486dx4 1994&pg=PA140#v=onepage&q=Pc magazine 486dx4 1994&f=false
I bought a gaming PC in 1992 for just over a grand. Or rather it was bought for me as I was 12 :p

Those 3-4K figures are ridiculous.

I think it was '96 when I built my first custom PC and that was way less than a grand.

I'm that old I was around back then ;)
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2017
Posts
6,189
Location
In the Masonic Temple
The consoles are popular, and low hardware compared to dedicated GPU means the devs should be able to code effectively meaning you dont need a 2080ti for good looking titles i.e. GoW on PS4 is amazing.



Yeah they are absolutely rigging the market together I have no doubt about it. The roadmaps laid out for decades have proven to trickle stuff slowly rather than innovate rapidly.
I'm glad someone else sees that. It's become pretty obvious imho, give amd the consoles, keep the mid to high end to nvidia, the low and mid to amd again, the consoles for the kids and the easy gaming crowd, and streaming for the casuals and cash strapped.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
@FoxEye A vega 56 can do 1440p ultra, and is under £300 so in your definition that is mid range as it competes just below a 1080 or 2070 especially if you flash a 64 bios to it and undervolt/overclock it, it can be level with those cards.
Isn't that what I said? Vega 56 is mid-low and 2070S is mid-high.

So we're back where I said we were: mid-range starts at £300.

And Vega 56 is EOL. After it's gone we only have £400+ mid-range cards atm.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2017
Posts
6,189
Location
In the Masonic Temple
I bought a gaming PC in 1992 for just over a grand. Or rather it was bought for me as I was 12 :p

Those 3-4K figures are ridiculous.

I think it was '96 when I built my first custom PC and that was way less than a grand.

I'm that old I was around back then ;)
I have always aimed for around £500 for a pc since my 486dx 40 and if i didn't upgrade the entire system it would be £500 for a few of things like MB cpu and ram, or gpu, or monitor and ram e.t.c until recently when it started at £500 for a MB case and cpu and then £500 and then £500 and then £500 adding more to it it's got outta control now im a grown up
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
1440p ultra is the top of mid range, hence £280, hence vega. An rx 590 would be mid range as it can still do 1440p with high settings.
I'm sorry but if you define V56 as the very top of mid-range than you are saying that 2060S and 5700 are high-end.

Nobody is going to agree with that.

Anway we talk about Resolution+Refresh, not RES alone.

1440p/100+ is top of mid-range. 1440p/60 is not there.

I don't think V56 can do 1440p/100+ can it.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2017
Posts
6,189
Location
In the Masonic Temple
I'm sorry but if you define V56 as the very top of mid-range than you are saying that 2060S and 5700 are high-end.

Nobody is going to agree with that.

Anway we talk about Resolution+Refresh, not RES alone.

1440p/100+ is top of mid-range. 1440p/60 is not there.

I don't think V56 can do 1440p/100+ can it.
We should stop this now, unless we are going to classify the tiers of gpus by ourselves.
You could say anything that will run 4k on any settings at 60fps is a high end, which on my vega 64 I could run many many many games at 4k at tweaked high / very high settings at 60fps 4k... so there is no way to really justify either of our arguments here my friend.

Yes it can do 100fps at 1440p, obviously depending on the game, and again thats where we can never sort this out lol
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Sep 2017
Posts
6,189
Location
In the Masonic Temple
I think the majority will agree with me that TU-106 2060/S is not high-end.
They will agree that, until you ask them to make a decisive list of what requirements a low mid and high card should have, at which point anyone could shatter that with a different card suggestion.

If you can buy a gpu at £50 or at £1900 (kingpin ) then a mid range would be £900
Like i said lets just agree that neither of us has any clue what high or mid range is or where it stops because everything is a mess.

When i bought a vega 64 (the best card amd offered at the time) I certainly thought at £600 it was high end being 1080 performance and only a 1080ti beating it.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Jun 2005
Posts
2,751
Location
Edinburgh
I bought a gaming PC in 1992 for just over a grand. Or rather it was bought for me as I was 12
Well I was in my first IT job buying this stuff. It really was that expensive. Hard drives were particularly pricey. The 486SX was cheaper though and popular for budget gaming.

Of course you need to double these prices to account for inflation...
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Dec 2005
Posts
40,065
Location
Autonomy
Hi end is the fastest GFX card 2080ti This is not even a 4k card TBH and certainly not with RTX enabled

Mid is Radeon 7 1080ti, 2080 2070s will do 4 k at a push but will cream 3440 x 1440p

low is all the stuff below mid :p stuff like the 1070 and 2060 are 1080p cards IMO ( The 1070 aint a 1440p card at high settings, worn the T shirt)

then you have entry level :p These will do 1080p at a push and run office :p
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Well I was in my first IT job buying this stuff. It really was that expensive. Hard drives were particularly pricey. The 486SX was cheaper though and popular for budget gaming.

Of course you need to double these prices to account for inflation...
That's not a fair comparison. Corporate IT tends to spend waaaaay more than consumer prices on stuff. At least they do at our place. £700+ for a basic laptop (no GPU, low-wattage CPU). But then we're government and we like to get shafted as much as possible on every purchase.

As said my gaming PC was £1200 in '92. You spent more than that for corporate IT stuff.

I'm happy to accept they are both true and not really comparable.

Anyway, since '92 prices dropped a metric ton and PC stuff became a common commodity. Now we're climbing up teh other side of the valley. You see? We're going back to '92 prices. nVidia will take us all the way back ;)
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Jul 2005
Posts
20,044
Location
Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
The vega is mid for sure. Only recently has it come down to 300 or below. That said on launch it was meh, however as it matured with some drivers you have it beating a 1070ti which costs £450, comfortably beating a 1070 which is £320. It is unfortunately a higher tier for AMD due to the expensive memory choice. The 590 was rather pointless but under £200 its reasonable especially with the game offers.
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Dec 2005
Posts
40,065
Location
Autonomy
So the 2080 and radeon 7 being as fast as the absolute top end of top tier the 1080ti , is now suddenly a mid teir?

Yes...You can't call something High end when its the same speed as 2.5 year tech....

The 1080 TI was once high end ...Its not now and as the 2080 and Rad7 and 2070s only just match its Mid...in Gaming GFX develops and GFX cards loose their power over time...The 2080 is a young card but lacks grunt for current games at higher resolutions...

The High end is the 2080ti but is still a poor card as you cant use it at 4k with RTX enabled....So its a high end card when certain features are switched off...

The whole 20 series cards have been a disappointment from release...Rad 7 was meh....1080ti performance in 2019...is not high end.
 
Back
Top Bottom