Permabanned
Sad to see people cant comprehend why tests ware done on 720p.... But I must Admit they could have added 1440p also. The 720p is showing Raw power thats it.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2019
- Posts
- 27
thanks for that info its pointless me waiting for the prices to come up on sunday I dont want to spend more than £100 on a chip so I need to decide 2200G with B450 or I3 9100F with a B360 and hope I don't need to flash the bios.
Permabanned
its a Dodgy move init... Image if it was Zen2+Navi then it would be a winner
Soldato
So why stop at 720p then? Why not do 800x600 or 320x240?
Soldato
Welcome to the world of DG! 144p testing lol. Space invaders at 1000HZ Esports innit. no gamer worth their salt is gaming at less than 1000hz.
Permabanned
Cause Windows 10 is not operational at sub 720p resolutions ?? I would like to see 320p tests.
@decto well I'w just ran Handbrake 1.2 to see whats up. Total Rig consumption peaked at 333w from the wall cpu package maxed at 185w but hard to say what project they used for rendering
Associate
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2019
- Posts
- 27
Lol yes it would be, I heard the 9100f is a risky move with a b360 if you need to flash the bios because it has no graphics on chip I need to look into this.its a Dodgy move init... Image if it was Zen2+Navi then it would be a winner
Associate
Oh god roll on sunday..... christ!
Permabanned
Soldato
And anyone spending £500 on a cpu other than a VERY small minority will not be running it at 720p. It's fine publishing it but basing opinion on such a niche setting makes no sense.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2015
- Posts
- 18,514
8 PCB Vs 6 PCB, you'll find slight differences if your into hard core memory benchmarking . Like 8 Pack checking for Efficiency in boards as he mentioned earlier .
As you mentioned really picking at twigs until you nail a good CPU that can handle 3733hz then multiple that with 4 Dimm slots populated .
And if your looking at that, your less likely to be gaming and Geomapping the Amazon rainforest or crunching mobile phone data ....
Very close together numbers....
Last edited:
Permabanned
its there to show Raw cpu power vs Raw cpu power. Lets run benchmarks on 16k with 2x2080ti doing like 20-30fps and cpu useage at 40%. Would that be good ??
It's a Cpu review not Gpu review and i like 720p shows architecture differences better. How specific tasks work on one platform and on the other. It's test that will show Best and Worst case scenario.
Don
Last time I used something like 720p was a good 15+ years ago.
then its bang up to date.
Permabanned
hmm not that long ago for me i was going for Super Pi record with stripped windows xp ect
Not like 720p benchmark is unfair is it ?? All cpus ran on same resolution so all shown best and worst they have simple.
Soldato
I know what it's for, but it's an unrealistic scenario which will affect <1% of people so basing opinion on it is just not worthwhile. It's like testing performance on Windows XP or on SteamOS. It's not really going to make much difference now is it?
Soldato
Exactly. Removes any GPU bottleneck
Don
And that’s the rub of the green isn’t it. Why don’t we use SuperPi as a CPU benchmark these days?
Associate
That is correct as far as i know most people will be gaming at 4k or 1440p or at least 1080p, higher the resolution the less difference in frames per second?
Take that with a pinch of salt as i am a bit rusty.
Dan.