RIP John McCririck

Caporegime
Joined
25 Nov 2004
Posts
25,828
Location
On the road....
Always found racing boring but he put an interesting slant on it, I could listen to him talking his pitch quite happily which is some achievement on somebody who’d reach for the off switch usually as soon as the racing started.

Bit of a one off, very marmite in terms of popularity, a horse racing equivalent of Geoff Boycott I’d say.

R.I.P.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9447954/john-mccririck-dead-wife-channel-4-sacked/

Was sad read this a day ago John McCririck died from Lung Cancer. His cigars killed him.

Lung cancer is world number 1 cancer killer, it has survival rate up to 2 years if catch at very early stage but lung cancer often is the silent killer. My mother's friend Mary one day suffered bad back pain and struggled to walked around house then his GP came to visited her and examined her then called a doctor and they came to the house to examined her and gave their opinions agreed Mary have lung cancer. Then after done MRI scan at hospital confirmed she have stage 4 lung cancer, she was devastated after doctors told her she have 3 months to live without treatments or around 6 months with treatments. She decided to have treatments to extend her life but she died 3 months later back in 2010. Mary was smoking all her life and was very healthy at old age. 3 days ago on Thursday my mother told me her friend Jean was admitted to hospital suffered chest infection and doctors found fluid build up in her left lung and had an operation to drained fluid out and doctors just discovered Jean has lung cancer. Jean had quitted smoking 2 weeks ago as her eyes had improved after suffered eyes cataracts for a few years. She is yet to hear what treatments will suit her and how long she will live.

Cancer and smoking is horrible!

John McCririck would still alive and lived to 100 if he never smoked cigars.

RIP John McCririck
Cancer and smoking is indeed horrible (I am a smoker myself) but, I’ll never forget when sat in a cardiac unit after my two heart attacks (which were not smoking related) a cardiologist saying that my smoking wasn’t his primary concern, as he put it “I didn’t seem to be particularly susceptible to it” which astounded me, I pressed him further and he said there’s basically two kinds of people, those who will get lung cancer and those who won’t.

He alluded to four of his patients all of whom were non smokers yet all had aggressive lung cancer along with linked cardiovascular issues.

He asked me about my grandparents, both lived until very old age but neither died of nor had cancer despite being smokers since childhood.

He felt (as a cardiologist rather than cancer specialist) that finding out why some were susceptible to cancer yet others were not was the key to finding an eventual cure.

You can be a life long smoker and not die of cancer or indeed a respiratory disease on the other hand you can be a small child who’s never smoked nor been exposed to smoke yet contract lung cancer....

I’m not for a moment implying smoking is fine - it isn’t - and it will increase your risk of getting cancer but it isn’t a given either.

An awful disease which hopefully one day they’ll find a cure for.
 
Back
Top Bottom