-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
OcUK RTX2070 Super and RTX2060 Super review thread
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
Soldato
If you with half a working brain think that played at Ultra or maxed graphics settings won't be worth it for a generation or two then you realises you made a mistake bought MSI GTX 1070 played games at lower than Ultra graphics settings, you should had bought GTX 1050 instead to played games at low graphics settings.
Thanks, the 1440p rtx results are really impressive! Now I'm wondering what the 2080s will be like.
Soldato
Going by the benchies I've seen on youtube they show the 5700xt marginally slower than the 2070 super @ 1440p (where I reckon these cards should be placed), with the wins being swapped between the two cards, hardly "destroying" the 5700xt. I reckon overall the 2070 super is the faster card overall, but not by that much and it should be, its nearly £100 more expensive
But when Nvidia is the faster card, you must say destroyed in order to warrant the additional £100
Soldato
Ah.....yeah, sorry, forgot about that
As an aside, I was looking at getting either one of these cards (I hold no allegiance to either company, just value for money) and the 5700xt seemed the best value/performance offering in comparison, I mean 5-10% increase in framerate for nearly £100 difference, no brainer really
Soldato
From what I've seen they're better than a 2070 and nearly as good as a 2070 super already
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 6,824
Anyone truly not bothered about ray tracing i think the 5700xt is a pretty exciting prospect now the prices got a pre launch cut.
My issue is - and it is pretty much the same as it was 10 years ago with physX.
RTX may not be that well supported yet, but when it is it is pretty blooming lovely imo and as such i would find it hard if paying that amount of money to not pay a bit more and at least have the option of it.
but ... for those convinced it is going to fail - and there seem to be a lot in that camp - then AMD have a nice offering .
My issue is - and it is pretty much the same as it was 10 years ago with physX.
RTX may not be that well supported yet, but when it is it is pretty blooming lovely imo and as such i would find it hard if paying that amount of money to not pay a bit more and at least have the option of it.
but ... for those convinced it is going to fail - and there seem to be a lot in that camp - then AMD have a nice offering .
Yup I’m sure the AIB model will close the gap!