Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Do you have your catalogue on an ssd? That helps. Ironically LR can be faster if you disable gpu acceleration.
2070 all seem to be way over £400+
would a 2060 give a nice boost in performance from a gtx970 ?
£330 8-core CPU beats 14 core Apple. Totally unsurprised, but still hilarious.
Horshack said:I just did a quick test on my 6-core i7-8750H 32GB Nvidia GTX 1060 notebook, focusing on import times with full 1:1 previews, with the assumption that would utilize the same image processing engine as the develop module when it has to generate a 1:1 preview on demand (ie, when you zoom in to 1:1 without an existing preview available):
Mix of 85 Nikon Z6/Z7 raw files, 3.61GB total, all in filesystem cache:
* Import w/full 1:1 previews - Old LR: 3:29, New LR w/GPU enabled: 3:21
* Export JPGs, 80% quality - Old LR: 2:51, New LR w/GPU enabled: 2:51
Gannon Burgett DPReview adminstrator and writer said:Gannon Burgett
@Horshack: Adam is correct, this won't be affecting anything outside of the Develop module, from my understanding. This is only meant to improve how quickly adjustments are applied to the images.
£330 8-core CPU beats 14 core Apple. Totally unsurprised, but still hilarious.
Well the new Lightroom update claims to now make use of GPU properly.. Time will tell. I just installed it yesterday
Also want to get back in to some gaming so happy to upgrade
the 2060 super is £100 more than the 2060. Is the performance jump worth £ 100 ?
Thats great and yes i do like to keep things for a while if i can
Thank you im ordering the 2060 super now
Must resist upgrading to 3900x!!!The Ryzen 3000 CPUs are core for core faster in Lightroom batch processing than the equivalent Intel CPUs,which the Ryzen 2000 CPUs are not - a Ryzen 7 2700X is slower than the 6C/12T Core i7 8086K,and the 8C/16T Ryzen 7 3700X is 59% faster than a 8C/16T Ryzen 7 2700X.
The most time consuming single function in Lightroom is exporting.
Puget systems also publishes extensive Adobe PS benchmarks too.
The second one I created from the chart on their website which has a ton of HEDT CPUs included too(I omitted them).
Look at the Ryzen 7 3800X and Ryzen 3900X scores against the Core i9 9900K,and its no wonder Puget Systems rates them as similar in overall performance. The former two are between 25% to 30% faster compared to a Ryzen 7 2700X.
The Ryzen 5 3600 looks a very good mainstream choice compared to the CFL Core i5 CPUs.
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/a...AretheRyzen3rdgenerationCPUsgoodforPhotoshop?
A lot of PS tasks are lightly threaded still - the Ryzen 3000 and Intel CFL CPUs trade blows at stock clockspeeds.