850 pro 3D MLC about to die?

Soldato
OP
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
Its now completely dead.

I put it in the ryzen rig, installed OS, and ran anvil benchmark and as part of its ssd testing it writes many small files so good i/o test for that type of load and on its first run the i/o locked up the same as the first time on my main rig.

I rebooted no drive in bios.

Power cycled no drive in bios.

Tried a few more times no drive in bios.

Powered down main pc and connected to main pc and no drive in bios.

Also only shows as generic usb device if I try to use via my usb sata adaptor.

So this behaviour is now across 3 different sata cables, two different motherboards, clean installation of windows 10, existing install of windows 8.1 and on both AMD and intel platforms.
 
Associate
Joined
26 Jan 2018
Posts
1,089
Location
Southampton
Yep, I also had the same issue very recently on a Sammy 850 Pro.

Just sent it back to Amazon which is where I got it and they sent me another new one the next day.

Pretty poor from a 'Pro' model drive, the whole point of the Pro if you look on Samsungs website is that it's more reliable!

I have 3 other Samsung SSD's that are none pro, all working fine...:D
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
Yep, I really dont know why anyone would think the drive would be fine moving forward, I dont think I have seen a single report of a ssd on the entire internet where its failed to post in bios and its proceeded to work fine for many years after that (unless the cause is confirmed to be the cable).

Also agree upon the oddity of it been the pro drive failing, my 830s have done way more erase cycles, they only planar NAND and are also smaller drives (so more erase cycles with the lower space) yet are still fine.

We might have an answer as to why the 860 pro's warranty got nerfed to 5 years. Something which the reviewers of the drive thought was odd.
 
Associate
Joined
15 Apr 2019
Posts
1,140
Thanks for sharing your experience, pity it's such a bad experience though. Definitely seems like the Samsung SSDs' premium prices aren't worth that extra cost at all.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
This guy had similar, defective drive sent back, and when he reported copying a 100gig file caused errors, their response was (but its ok with 3 gig files right?), he eventually did get a replacement. It would seem their diagnostics is not very thorough.

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/my-first-ssd-failure-sam-850-pro-256gb.2538866/post-39342780

Samsung havent yet authorised a new RMA for me. So I still have the drive and no new DHL booked yet.

I was looking into buying a new ssd a few days ago, and consider now the 860 pro's are nerfed to 5 years to match the evo's and the rated TBW of evo's priced the same as pro's is equal it would seem the pro's are indeed a bad buy.

So e.g. I can get either a 860 1TB evo or 512gig 860 pro for about 120-130gbp, and both have a 5 year warranty, and both have a 600TBW rating. The 1TB evo's write speeds (outside of the SLC cache) is also almost as fast as the 860 pro, its only the 512gig and lower models which have the much lower speeds. Samsung never explained why warranty period's on the 860 pro's were halved vs 850 pro's but the only logical answer is that the policy was costing them money.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
Well people, this has got a whole lot more interesting.

I got another drive from samsung, they exchanged it. Its a what I presume a refurbished 850 pro, given they no longer manufactured.

I put the drive in the system and crc errors spiral up.

I then test it in my AMD system, and is no crc errors, test it in my NUC, no crc errors.
Put it back in my intel machine, crc errors. I swap its port and cable with my 860 evo, still crc errors, but at the same the 860 evo gets 0 errors on the port and cable the 850 pro is on, so whats going on?

Just to clarify as well the crc errors had visible effects, such as 10 seconds to load paint, chkdsk taking 3x as long and a massive slowdown on read performance on benchmarks (no affect on write).

I then thought what if I have a bad cable on a good sata port and a good cable on a bad sata port.

So I swapped the cables and put the 850 pro again on the second port, and the crc errors stopped. Did lots of benchmarking, various tests no crc errors.

The explanation for the 860 evo getting no errors I think its down to the enhanced ECC controller, the 860 series SSD's have better error correction. Which as a side effect it seems can mitigate dodgy cables/ports. I tested the 830 from my laptop on the bad port and that also had spiralling crc errors during reads.

So I did the following as I didnt want any storage device on that bad port and I have no spare ports.

Optical drive moved to sata port 0 (bad port)
System SSD on sata port 1
Second SSD (860 evo) on sata port 2
Spindles moved round accordingly, one of them moved to the asmedia port that the optical drive was using.

However there is bad news, I have had 2 CRC errors since I did this setup in the space of about 30 hours uptime. Its never gone up during a benchmark, one came whilst not on pc, another came during a chkdsk, but I have done dozens of chkdsk's (trying to trigger it) without issue. So this other port is definitely in much better condition but there is still something not right, I havent checked any other ports, and I am ordering more cables.

It is looking like tho I am going to switch the board, probably go back to asus as on asus boards I have never had sata ports fail and especially when the board is as new as this one is.

Now I may be wrong but from my observations the CRC error counter on SSD's is related to failed read attempts, I believe failed write attempts wont increment this counter, with writes you either get what the controller thinks is a success but actually flipped bit (silent corruption), or a completely failed write which would increase SMART but I think would be a different variable. So my concern is silent data corruption at this point.

Also perhaps what is worth mentioning is the affect of the drivers. The system has been running on the msahci drivers, which I always considered the safer drivers to use. I observed during testing that (a) errors accrued faster on msahci vs iRST, and (b) when 2 more or more CRC errors occurred during a session on iRST then until the next reboot that device is throttled to sata 300 speeds, which killed the errors dead. Been throttled to half burst speed is preferable to having to retry reads and having silent data corruption. So I now consider intel drivers safer.

What I am doing going forward.

I think I am going to buy a 1tb 860 EVO to replace the 850 pro in this rig, having realised the value of better ECC. I will repurpose the 850 pro to something else. Currently the system is running with the 850 on the second sata port.

I will replace the board, damaged sata traces I think makes this board impractical to use and I can only see that going one way which is further decaying.

Asus Z390 ROG hero board to replace it alongside an asmedia sata card since that board only has 6 sata ports.

The board itself has been a nightmare if I am been honest.

Purchased the board, and originally it couldnt even post all the time just in XMP mode on two different sets of ram, even in jedec it wasnt 100%. Brought a 2nd board, and the posting issue was fixed, so first board was returned.
On the 2nd board which is this one in use now, it has aweful coil whine when cstates are enabled, in addition coil whine when NIC port is active regardless of cstates on/off. It also cannot manage 3200mhz ram speeds on the secondary dimm slots, and now has broken SATA ports. It is out of retail warranty although I will check if it has a manufacturer one.

I am considering the option of just throttling sata down to gen 2, as can be done in the bios.

The kingston SSD is like the 860 evo in that it can just eat up all the errors and correct them on the fly. Hence that was working ok.

final note, my hatred of m.2 has diminished, I now see a legit value of removing cables from the equation. Although I still consider the better solution been using pcie slots for nvme.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
27 Feb 2015
Posts
12,621
So what is the ending to this saga :)

I know I have dished m.2 but I had the following options I felt.

Buy a new sata SSD with better ECC and also not use the main sata port for it.
Buy a new board very almost did this, what held me off is if I buy a new board it should be with a future upgrade in mind so I sat thinking about amd and intel upgrade paths both of which I considered bad options for me.
Switch to a m.2 ssd which is what I ended up doing, 970 evo's have been discounted due to 970 evo plus coming to market so I got a cheaper 970 evo 1tb and thats my new system ssd. System boots and shuts down slower now tho it seems to just have extra periods of waiting in both bootup and shutdown. Otherwise as expected no noticeable difference but I did it due to the sata issue and I guess given how close in price it was to a 860 evo it made more sense.

I have a sata pcie card I got as well, as installing the m.2 disabled 2 sata ports so right now I am short. But I have no immediate use for my optical drive now as it was only been used for final fantasy 7 disc verification which I discovered can work from usb sticks. So the card isnt installed yet. It has 4 sata ports on it.

The newer 850 pro got repurposed to my ps4 pro.
 
Back
Top Bottom