it took four trips to Worcester Magistrates' Court before his appeal was heard. After losing the case, he lost a further crown court appeal in August.
Yeah screw that.
5mph over and your evidence is your memory against their cameras so your defence goes with maybe the camera was faulty or it flashed someone else?
Come on man. Who in their right mind pays for legal representation over a £100 fine with no evidence like your own dashcam with a speed reading (is that even acceptable I wonder?).
Seems like he was pretty convinced he wasn't speeding. But spending your son's inheritance for the sake of a few points and a fine, that's stupid. Take one for the team.
if a police man said you were speeding, the court takes that as enough evidence.
you cant win
fixed that for you.I'm not a lawyer, but I can only imagine scrawling "no case to answer" on the form rather than ticking the "not guilty" box when there's evidence from a fixed camera is among the fastest ways to let the magistrate know you're a massive bell end.
Only been caught once. So your wrongWell this guy used zero evidence to fight a camera and lost.
Only been caught once. So your wrong
33 in a 30.
Wow.. Right over your head ehWhat are you on about.
This guy, in the article, the thread is about, tried to fight camera evidence by flailing wildly at the hope the cameras were faulty.
Are you talking about yourself now?
Wow.. Right over your head eh