"We have found the formula for a perfect model relationship." [ARTICLE]

Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,062
Location
Leeds
Imagine being the other guy in that relationship, you just come round and plow the girl while her boyfriend is in the other room then leave, I bet he has a right laugh about it
 
Associate
Joined
31 Jul 2018
Posts
254
So your other half gets pillboxs while you flap off in the other room, nasty. Women have it is so much easier when it come to sex as there is an endless supply of saps. Any man in his right mind would throw her out or depending on the mortgage repayments run out that door if their wife/girlfriend was getting Macroned.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
It'll be the difference between having someone and having no one, becoming abusive and suicidal.

Though i'm sure many of the alpha men in this thread think that if you can't get someone to live with, then you're a failure and should probably take the rope. The same people who likely wonder why no one cares about men's issues. smh
Nah you're well wide of the mark.

I'm one of the most beta men on the planet, most likely. My record with the wimmins is non-existent, because I can't even look them in the eyes.

The idea of settling for this kind of relationship - even if it was the only thing on offer from now until I die - is not something even I would be prepared to accept. It's not even a question of self-respect, because I don't really respect myself in the slightest.

It's a question of not wanting to put yourself in a position of submission, and shame, and humiliation.

Some people like that/get off on it. But that's nothing to do with alpha/beta status. This chap is either living in complete denial, or enjoying the humiliation it brings.

I'd rather stick with internet porn ;)
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,912
Some people like that/get off on it. But that's nothing to do with alpha/beta status. This chap is either living in complete denial, or enjoying the humiliation it brings.

Fair enough re: the rest of your post but I would quibble here and say that the behaviour of the author is very much "beta", that doesn't necessarily imply that all "beta males" are necessarily going to be into this but just that, along with being an incel, being cuckolded is generally considered to be a very beta thing.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
Fair enough re: the rest of your post but I would quibble here and say that the behaviour of the author is very much "beta", that doesn't necessarily imply that all "beta males" are necessarily going to be into this but just that, along with being an incel, being cuckolded is generally considered to be a very beta thing.
I'm not an "incel". That word has a lot of connotations of women-hate and all that jazz. None of which applies to me.

I'm a bloke who isn't that fussed about being in a relationship, and whilst occasionally I might think, "What's wrong with you, man," I mostly just find other things to do, and save myself the stress of it all.

Most blokes find women enjoyable to be around, but for me the stress it generates is insurmountable. That doesn't make me hate women, I just can't act normally around them, is all.

Some people would question if I can act normally at any time, but those people are dirty left-wing types whose opinions are even less wanted than my own :p
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
14,089
Location
Bath
"She would not want me to have the same" is the key part IMO, particularly since what they're referring to is "two people having a good time."

Polygamous relationships, sure. Relationships in which one/some of the people are monogamous and one/some are polygamous, sure. A relationship in which one person is allowed to have a good time with other people and the other person is not because their partner wouldn't like it, no. It's not a decision he's made for himself. It's a decision she's made at him. That's what makes it wrong IMO.
This is precisely it for me. If he had the option and declined, no problem. The fact that option is taken away from him despite it being requested by his partner is not a fair and equal relationship.

Sort of on topic, but logically speaking I've always felt that the possessive nature of our sexual relationships is an interesting demonstration of just how powerfully our cultures shape our feelings. In theory, I shouldn't have an issue with my wife having a purely physical relationship with someone else, any more than I should have issue with her being friends with someone. It shouldn't impact our relationship. And yet, I would be devastated if she did, or at best would find it extremely uncomfortable even if I could accept it logically. Same goes if it were me in the other shoes. The only reason I can imagine I'd feel that way is because I've spent my life being told that I should. Any other perspectives on that?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
This is precisely it for me. If he had the option and declined, no problem. The fact that option is taken away from him despite it being requested by his partner is not a fair and equal relationship.

Sort of on topic, but logically speaking I've always felt that the possessive nature of our sexual relationships is an interesting demonstration of just how powerfully our cultures shape our feelings. In theory, I shouldn't have an issue with my wife having a purely physical relationship with someone else, any more than I should have issue with her being friends with someone. It shouldn't impact our relationship. And yet, I would be devastated if she did, or at best would find it extremely uncomfortable even if I could accept it logically. Same goes if it were me in the other shoes. The only reason I can imagine I'd feel that way is because I've spent my life being told that I should. Any other perspectives on that?
Well you can't get an STD from being friends with someone, so the "possessive nature" or relationships does have some practical benefits.

e: Also the implications of unwanted pregnancy. A bit different if its by your partner than some random hook up.
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
14,089
Location
Bath
Well you can't get an STD from being friends with someone, so the "possessive nature" or relationships does have some practical benefits.

Droll, but actually you might be onto something. Maybe we are historically jealous lovers because we don't want to raise the offspring of others. I suppose it's not uncommon in nature either.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
29,472
Location
Dominating rooms with symmetry
Any other perspectives on that?

It’s pretty normal, the possessiveness for some doesn’t just fall within the relationship period either. Whether they would admit to it or not most men aren’t comfortable with the thought that another dude has had his member in their partner before them. Whereas women aren’t so fussed about a mans history, in fact a more sexually successful man can be more appealing to them.

I can’t imagine how someone like Kanye West must feel when there’s a video of his wife all over the internet getting the BBC, I’d say without doubt it contributed towards his mental health issues.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
This is precisely it for me. If he had the option and declined, no problem. The fact that option is taken away from him despite it being requested by his partner is not a fair and equal relationship.

Sort of on topic, but logically speaking I've always felt that the possessive nature of our sexual relationships is an interesting demonstration of just how powerfully our cultures shape our feelings. In theory, I shouldn't have an issue with my wife having a purely physical relationship with someone else, any more than I should have issue with her being friends with someone. It shouldn't impact our relationship. And yet, I would be devastated if she did, or at best would find it extremely uncomfortable even if I could accept it logically. Same goes if it were me in the other shoes. The only reason I can imagine I'd feel that way is because I've spent my life being told that I should. Any other perspectives on that?
Yes.

People are possessive in relationships because on some selfish human level they treat others like possessions. In other words, no matter how you logically frame your emotions there will be a part of you that thinks your partner is yours. And that’s a natural, human defence because it means you monopolise the sexual output and reproduction of your partner.

Feelings do not have to be logical or consistent. It’s also perfectly possible to feel and think things that are absurd polar opposites at the same time (especially sexually and on this very issue, namely wanting your partner to be faithful yet legitimately having the horn elsewhere). I wouldn’t feel bad about it if you did. We’re human. I suggest we are defined (and should be judged) predominantly by our actions. Your actions are you more than anything else. You can’t control your feelings or thoughts and it take some guru-like temperance to stop them controlling you.
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
14,089
Location
Bath
It’s pretty normal, the possessiveness for some doesn’t just fall within the relationship period either. Whether they would admit to it or not most men aren’t comfortable with the thought that another dude has had his member in their partner before them.
Funny enough, after being with my wife for 10 years, one night she asked if I knew that, before we started dating, she was FWB with a mutual friend of ours who now is married in another country. Absurdly, despite this happening 11 years ago, completely legitimately, I felt like I'd been cheated on because I had just found out about it.

So yeah, logic and emotion make strange bedfellows.

I've always assumed that it was a cultural thing. @Nitefly it sounds as though you're suggesting it's more of a baked in psychological situation?
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
24 Sep 2005
Posts
35,492
@Devrij quote fail? ^ :p

I certainly think that culture pressure influences our tendency towards monogamy (which is on balance how most people successfully sustain their sexual and companionship needs). What I was suggesting is that people inherently want their partners to be monogamous in order to monopolise them, despite the fact they may selfishly (and very secretly) want to be polygamous - to plunder the fruits of the world and return to their faithful and committed partner without criticism for their ways. It’s absurd and childish on any logical level (i.e. having your cake and eating it). But probably true for many people (to varying degrees).
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2007
Posts
5,581
Location
London
I'm not an "incel". That word has a lot of connotations of women-hate and all that jazz. None of which applies to me.

I'm a bloke who isn't that fussed about being in a relationship, and whilst occasionally I might think, "What's wrong with you, man," I mostly just find other things to do, and save myself the stress of it all.

Most blokes find women enjoyable to be around, but for me the stress it generates is insurmountable. That doesn't make me hate women, I just can't act normally around them, is all.

Some people would question if I can act normally at any time, but those people are dirty left-wing types whose opinions are even less wanted than my own :p

You cannot be not that fussed, its either you want it or not.

Do you have stress interacting with people or is it specifically women?

Nothing is insurmountable
 
Back
Top Bottom