Mortgage, property, rental TAX advice

Associate
Joined
18 Dec 2010
Posts
597
Hi all,

A friend is looking to buy a property for around £500,000.

He is on a 50k salary. He has 150k saving to cover 25% deposit and rest for stamp duty and fees.

Now for the remainder 350k his salary isn’t enough to get that much out from the bank. The only way he can is if he buys a property as a buy to let instead of residential.

Now my question is if he purchases a buy to let house will he be expected to pay tax by inland revenue? There won’t be a rental income as he will be living in it.

Is there a way around this?

Thanks
 
Associate
Joined
3 May 2007
Posts
2,007
Your friend can't afford a 500k house and should look at a cheaper one.

Most if not all BTL mortgages require you to be a homeowner already and pretty sure the lender won't give him a BTL on a place he intends to live in.

/Salsa
 
Associate
OP
Joined
18 Dec 2010
Posts
597
Your friend can't afford a 500k house and should lool at a cheaper one.

/Salsa

His monthly expense is 1k and saves 2k a month. His 2k is more then enough to cover a 350k mortgage repayments.

Update: His a home owner already with mortgage fully paid. This would be a second home. Current house his going to let his parents stay when he purchases a second home.
 

VoG

VoG

Soldato
Joined
20 Jan 2004
Posts
5,870
Location
Nottingham
Well for starters he's commiting fraud buy taking out a btl mortgage for a private residential property, if the bank gets wind of that there will be hell to pay & they would be well within their rights to pull the plug & repossess the property, second surely a btl mortgage would be more costly than a private residential property, & thirdly if thats the only way he can do it then live in landlord is his best bet, & finally he won't get taxed on a non existant rental income tho i suspect the taxman will be asking some damn uncomfortable questions of both him & his bank as to whats what.
 
Associate
OP
Joined
18 Dec 2010
Posts
597
His a home owner already with mortgage fully paid. This would be a second home. Current house his going to let his parents stay when he purchases a second home.

If he purchases a buy to let house can he then change it to a residential?
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Oct 2004
Posts
18,321
Location
Birmingham
Why not just tell the bank he earns 100k instead of 50k? Would be easier than going claiming he's going to be renting it out and then he'd only have to worry about lying to the bank instead of the tax man as well
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Nov 2006
Posts
4,929
Are you able to let it to yourself? So essentially put a direct debit for the rent through from one account to another and back then have a properly protected deposit etc but in your name? Imagine this is sketchy ground though.

Edit yourself being general, in relation to your mate.
 
Associate
Joined
25 Apr 2004
Posts
2,496
Location
Chelmsford
Might be worth getting in touch with a mortgage broker.

One option is to release equity from his house that he has paid off. As in a small buy-to-let mortgage on his current place, raising the required amount. His parents then pay some rent. Think even renting to family members is frowned on.

Something else that he REALLY needs to think about...... The uk is in the middle of something called Brexit. At the moment his expenses are tiny and should he be out of work for a while ........ he is fine. Now in my opinion, you have to be nuts to take on more debt and put yourself in a position where you must have a job to survive right now. Also why buy now when property prices are sliding across the board?
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Oct 2008
Posts
12,472
Location
Designing Buildings
Now for the remainder 350k his salary isn’t enough to get that much out from the bank.
Thanks

His monthly expense is 1k and saves 2k a month. His 2k is more then enough to cover a 350k mortgage repayments.

So which is it? The bank either can lend it to him if he can more than cover the payments or he can't!

A rough calculation on moneysavingexpert gets a monthly 1700+ for the mortgage alone based on a 25yr term leaving him with a shade over 200quid left over from his salary a month outwith his 1k expenses? So that would have him certainly at the top end of his available mortgage limit. Bank would see that as a higher risk I would think.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
3,686
Location
Sussex
On the tax issue, I believe they would only want tax on what you received as an income from being a landlord, if nothing is received then nothing is due.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Posts
3,119
On the tax issue, I believe they would only want tax on what you received as an income from being a landlord, if nothing is received then nothing is due.

Apart from the SDLT with additional 3% surcharge for it being a second property of course, amounting to some £30,000 in this instance.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Jan 2011
Posts
658
£50k salary isn’t enough to support a £350k mortgage. That’s what a mortgage broker will tell him.

Buy somewhere cheaper.
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Jul 2003
Posts
4,144
Location
Dundee
Even when I earned 65k max I could get is 325, that's after having a mortgage on a flat prior.
I think he's best to not bother looking at 500k properties, is their nothing around 300-400k?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,191
I think everyone is missing one side of this one.

The OP said their parents would be taking the current house and paying rent. This additional income could be taken into account for mortgage purposes but it is also taxable (at the higher rate) so you need to take into account losing 40% of that.
 
Back
Top Bottom