- Intel Core i9-10980XE 18 Core / 36 Thread - $999?
- Intel Core i9-10960X 16 Core / 32 Thread - $800?
- Intel Core i9-10940X 14 Core / 28 Thread - $700?
- Intel Core i9-10920X 12 Core / 24 Thread - $600?
- Intel Core i9-10900X 10 Core / 20 Thread - $500?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel Cannonlake, Cascade Lake, Ice Lake, Tiger Lake & Sapphire Rapid thread
- Thread starter TheF34RChannel
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,257
Are you sure it is performance per dollar, or per watt?
The official slide is about the dollars.
I am thinking about undervolting and underclocking if necessary
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 895
Wait, you are willing to pay 500$ for the 10 core but you find the 3900X expensive?
It is much harder to negotiate with intel from the consumer position about the pricing.
And the LGA 2066 is the better platform - quad-channel memory, more PCIe lanes..... Or at least the one that I'd target in all other equal conditions.
I am wondering - since when have AMD's CPUs become as expensive as intel's?
Maybe, the last time it was 15 years ago, back in 2004, no?
Anyways....
The 10-core 9820X is right now £800, maybe we will be lucky to get the new 10-core for £400-£450?
My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £808.69 (includes shipping: £8.70)
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 895
It is much harder to negotiate with intel from the consumer position about the pricing.
And the LGA 2066 is the better platform - quad-channel memory, more PCIe lanes..... Or at least the one that I'd target in all other equal conditions.
I am wondering - since when have AMD's CPUs become as expensive as intel's?
Maybe, the last time it was 15 years ago, back in 2004, no?
Anyways....
The 10-core 9820X is right now £800, maybe we will be lucky to get the new 10-core for £400-£450?
My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £808.69 (includes shipping: £8.70)
If the new 10 core will take on that price . . . AMD will dominate HEDT for good while.
I doubt their CPUs with "glue-inside" are as reliable. Imagine the 24-core Threadripper with 4! chiplets (3 8-core dies + 1 cIOd). The more chiplets a SKU has, the higher the likelihood there is a defect somewhere.
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 895
18-core and 10-core CPUs Geekbench 4.3.0 results:
This is with glue.
https://i.imgur.com/jpLjSMy.jpg
It is much harder to negotiate with intel from the consumer position about the pricing.
And the LGA 2066 is the better platform - quad-channel memory, more PCIe lanes..... Or at least the one that I'd target in all other equal conditions.
I am wondering - since when have AMD's CPUs become as expensive as intel's?
Maybe, the last time it was 15 years ago, back in 2004, no?
Anyways....
The 10-core 9820X is right now £800, maybe we will be lucky to get the new 10-core for £400-£450?
My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £808.69 (includes shipping: £8.70)
Hahaha. This entire post is basically saying it's okay for Intel to be expensive.
You want to negotiate with AMD on pricing? Is that what you do?
You're an Intel shill and everyone in this this forum knows that now. There is no need to try and hide that anymore.
Soldato
Don't need to, because it will have 5. That's how it works.
Caporegime
Intel i9 10920X 12 Core CPU Benchmark Leaked, Crushes AMD’s Threadripper 2920X
https://wccftech.com/intel-i9-10920x-12-core-cpu-benchmark-leaked-crushes-amds-threadripper-2920x/
https://wccftech.com/intel-i9-10920x-12-core-cpu-benchmark-leaked-crushes-amds-threadripper-2920x/
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,257
If only they had some actual information to divulge.
A leaked benchmark, no pricing, no delivery, no actual data.
The geekbench data is seriously flawed also, as I looked up geekbench 4 results for the 2920, and the figures range all over the place, but seems vastly high that WTFtech are quoting.
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2017
- Posts
- 2,209
Wonder if they will mention the 3900x taking the 10920x out the back and putting a couple of slugs in the back of its head?
Not a good time to be an intel HEDT fan
Not a good time to be an intel HEDT fan
Not a good time to be an intel HEDT fan
Intel HEDT hasn't really moved on from second generation X79 - clock for clock even a 2697 v2 isn't hideously far behind everything since has been small iterations.
Soldato
Wonder if they will mention the 3900x taking the 10920x out the back and putting a couple of slugs in the back of its head?
Not a good time to be an intel HEDT fan
Since you asked
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14732665
That's 3900X stock on Win10 , 5863 single core, 50746 multi core. Compared to 5339 & 44046 of the 10920X.
And made Win10 bold because on Linux stock 3900X runs wild with ~20% higher multi core and ~10% on single core, on average.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=3900X&sort=multicore_score
FYI the 10980XE 18 core 36 thread
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14641176
Surely something is off as it cannot be less than 2% faster than the 3900X in multicore, given that the 9980XE is ~15-18% faster in multicore. (though has 50% more cores actually)
Last edited:
10th gen upgrades coming
Intel announces a new Microsoft update coming soon will boost how cores are selected for instructions. The update helps CPUs that use Turbo Boost such as the upcoming Intel 10th gen Lake X and Core desktop parts.
intel "claims" the update delivers 15% better single thread performance
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...erformance-via-favored-cpu-core-optimization/
Intel announces a new Microsoft update coming soon will boost how cores are selected for instructions. The update helps CPUs that use Turbo Boost such as the upcoming Intel 10th gen Lake X and Core desktop parts.
intel "claims" the update delivers 15% better single thread performance
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...erformance-via-favored-cpu-core-optimization/
Not just 10th gen:
For Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0, the following CPUs are supported:
- Intel® Core™ i7-69xx/68xx Processor Family
- Intel® Core™ i9-7900X/i9-7920X/i9-7940X/i9-7960X/i9-7980XE/i7-7820X/i7-9800X
- Intel® Core™ i9-9820X/i9-99x0XE/i9-99x0X
- Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-1600 v4 Product Family (single-socket only)
- Intel 10th Generation CPUs
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,257
This is very interesting, and I wonder if the update will account for some of the gap between Linux based scores and windows based scores.
It is possible that all chips will see this boost, but it might simply be that intel have steered their new chips towards the single core boost, as that is where they hope to show some signs of progress, the multi complete lost.
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 2,259
Does not work on manually set OC's.