I also like the look of the 21.9 monitors I guess. I’m just looking at specs for something more future proofed hence looking at the Acer for £500. Is there a notable difference in system ui and browsing using the 144hz over my old monitor even the 60hz below? Surely my card can run that hz fine for overall system use? Just games I’d have to run lower settings and the hz is just what ever your pc allows u to push etc.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/sams...s-super-widescreen-led-monitor-mo-23l-sa.html
You dont need to run lower settings your card will do the same as it did with the Sammy.
It was a PLS screen and the Acer is a IPS screen so you should see better viewing angles and it might look crispier but that again is nothing to do with your GPU.
People like to buy better GPU's when you have a 144mhz as the monitor allows you to run games at a higher FPS because you have a faster GPU and the extra headroom allows you to also up the visuals.
Think of it like a road you used to have that had a maximum speed allowed of 75mph. (Samsung)
The 970 is like a car that has a top speed of 75mph.
You then switch to a road that has a maximum speed allowed of 144mph (Acer)
The 970 can still do a top speed of 75mph on this new road exactly like it did before with the same visuals you used before.
Except now you can upgrade to a 2080 that will allow you to do 144mph with increased visuals.
Does that explain it better ?